Ruhaan Aditya

Protect this page

Not protected. HeartGlow ^(talk) 12:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

You are not using this template correctly because it is designed for protected pages and this page is not. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ruhaan Aditya

A tag has been placed on User:Ruhaan Aditya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry

I am sorry to edit the user page HeartGlow3007

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 10:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates. Serols (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhaan Aditya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock i beg Ruhaan Aditya (talk) 08:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 08:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhaan Aditya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock. I will never do the mistake. I accept my mistake and will never do it from now. Ruhaan Aditya (talk) 04:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not said anything about what your mistake actually is, so we can't tell from this request whether you understand it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

What is my mistake

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhaan Aditya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What is this not here to build encyclopedia? What is this kind of reason? What is my mistake actually? What is this kind of reason to block users? And what is my mistake; first tell me. Unblock me now. What mistake i have did. I will report this admin. Who is he. blocking user with a nosense reason.who is he. ok. he is Widr. i will complain. if you are the admin and you have the power to block someone that does not mean that you will block someone without reasons. i am not here to just here nonsense blocks without any reason what's my mistake. Just unblock me or will complain to police. I will complain to another admin to block this admin. just unblock me.मैं यहाँ आपके बकवास ब्लॉक कारण सुनने के लिए नहीं हूँ। मुझे अनब्लॉक करें या मैं तुरंत शिकायत करूंगा। Ruhaan Aditya (talk) 05:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Because of the legal threat, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page under Wikipedia's WP:NLT policy. When you are ready to unequivocally withdraw the legal threat, you may request the restoration of talk page access at WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Just for the record, मैं यहाँ आपके बकवास ब्लॉक कारण सुनने के लिए नहीं हूँ। is Hindi, which means: "I'm not here to hear your rubbish reasoning for block(s)". Google translate uses the word "bullshit" for बकवास in English translation for above sentence. But बकवास is not cursing, and is a very formal word. Ciao. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 36532

UTRS appeal #36532 is now closed.

deepfriedokra 2020-10-29 11:18:13 I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. (Please do not criticise or find fault with anyone else. Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.) Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Unblock reguest on UTRS

@Boing! said Zebedee, Widr, and 331dot: UTRS appeal #36732 I think that's the best they can do. I think restoring TPA so they can posit a request would be a waste of time-- this is it. Give 'em another chance? Ignore? Decline? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I've commented at the UTRS, but I think I could support an unblock on the understanding that we have no more of the same problems. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)