Russell Yee
I have responded to your comments there. I was somewhat annoyed with the list, as you can tell, and as i had not seen others like it yet, i was probably overly critical of you. Please accept my apology. I still think the list needs work, but its work that many other articles like it need, so its not that out of the ordinary. I changed your signature on your comments, as any exchanges about the articles really need to be here and not through our private email accounts. also, putting your email address on wp should be done sparingly. If you want people to write you directly, put your email on your userpage, or your talk page, but not on article talk pages (these are guidelines not rules, just trying to be helpful.). I put some comments on the topic of bibliographical inclusion criteria at Wikipedia:List of bibliographies and Lists of books, to see if anyone else has ideas for these types of lists.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
All good, thanks, sorry to not see this sooner. I am still the newbie and glad to be taught by someone who cares.russmoss (talk) 06:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Bibliography of Oakland, California for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bibliography of Oakland, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Oakland, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 00:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm very said to see this go but am grateful for the 8-year run it had, the many who helped edit and expand it, and all those who found it useful.russmoss (talk) 09:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)