Rustandbone
Ziad Abu Ein
editHey, how do i state what is presented in video documentation? The teeth are shown in video footages and pictures, but article's autopsy section does not reference to this fact, but has the notion the teeth may have been knocked out by IDF personnel! Could you please help me to integrate it? --18:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- It would be my pleasure to help you with this. The first step is to look through the various news articles that use the video as a source and find statements that those news articles say about the video. Can you please provide me with these articles and the direct quotations in them that you are referring to? Once we have that, we can paraphrase the information, without changing its meaning, and add it into the article. Rustandbone (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- In my case, no such thing was posted in an article. Why? The articles 1st were posted prior to the PA autopsy. And 2nd in the press articles journalist act like you, mostly the time, only cite PA opinions from named persons, so what can we do in case of evidence documented in videos (not in commentary of them)? Isn't the footages enough to state that he did obviously, plainly visible to all, not got his teeth knocked out at the incident - at least not by the IDF medic nor by the IDF personnel??
Please help me, Rustandbone, why? Because it is so screaming obvious, just look at the videos from the 3 cited sources, in the very beginning, when he is collapsing, all his mouth could be seen with all teeth intact. -- Nough said, I will leave it to you, because you did quite a good balanced article. A good day, and a successful week, and restful holidays, sincerely --15:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC) P.S. I am thinking, did someone like me reported harassment because of ip, i may (re)start an wikipedia id??
December 2014
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ziad Abu Ein. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Note this article is under 1RR. --Mdann52talk to me! 18:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Mdann52, and thank you for the warning. I apologize for any trouble I have caused and will try to be more cognizant of my actions. How can I constructively combat what I feel are vandalism and POV edits by IP editors on articles, such as the one that you refer to (Ziad Abu Ein)? Rustandbone (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- The best way is to try and discuss it with the other editor, then take it to WP:DR if that discussion fails to get a result. The page had been reverted back to the pre-dispute version and protected to encourage discussion on the talk page of the article. --Mdann52talk to me! 21:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Your experience with Wikipedia so far
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!