User talk:Rwessel/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Rwessel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Tikal
Tikal says "Little is known about Chak Tok Ich'aak except that he was killed on 14 January 378 AD. On the same day, Siyah K’ak’ (Fire Is Born) arrived from the west..." I took that to mean that Siyah K'ak' conquered it on 14 January but I suppose the wording leaves open the possibility that he hung around for two days first. —howcheng {chat} 18:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Howcheng:, the National Geographic reference in Siyaj K'ak' [1] includes the following:
Fire Is Born's forces continued their march on the city. By January 16, 378—barely a week after his arrival in Waka—the conqueror was in Tikal.
- Rwessel (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. —howcheng {chat} 19:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to May 31 does not have an edit summary. Hi. We are supposed to be using Edit Summaries when reverting Pending Changes. Cheers!
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
Thanks! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 07:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)