S11125

Please stop promoting a fansite. Thankssir (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not promoting anything...it's not a fansite, it's a site about her music. Alot of fans might be interested in that.

• The problem is that the site is unofficial and can't be used as a source for info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankssir (talk • contribs) 16:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean but I sourced everything with links from official sources like MTV.com and interviews (not from fansites) so the information is official.

• That's still the issue. The website is unofficial and because all the information was taken from the last unreleased britney spears materials that got deleted, it can't be applied here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankssir (talk • contribs) 17:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Britney Spears - Radar (song)

There is no evidence to support your assertion of Radar being released as a single, either on iTunes, or otherwise. Unless and until you can provide a verifiable reference (SEE: Wikipedia:Verifiability) - (a Britney Spears fan site is NOT a verifiable reference), please refrain from editing Wikipedia pages to reflect that Radar has been released as a single. Thank you. 71.141.114.187 (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

myspace

Anyone 14 years of age or older is permitted to create a myspace page. Everyone with a myspace page can post anything they desire. I could post on my own myspace page that I am working with Britney Spears on her new album. As such, myspace is not a verifiable reference source. Unless you can provide a verifiable reference (SEE: Wikipedia:Verifiability) - (a Britney Spears fan site is NOT a verifiable reference), please refrain from editing Wikipedia pages. Thank you. 71.141.114.187 (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Junior Vasquez' official myspace page

I understand what you're saying. However, myspace as a whole is not a verifiable reference source, including the Britney Spears "official" myspace page. As per Wikipedia:Verifiability - Self-published sources: Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable. As such, any information you may obtain on any myspace page is not verifiable. Thank you. 71.141.114.187 (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Not trying to interfere...

I'm not trying to interfere with the discussion between yourself and the user at 71.141.114.187, but MySpace is not a reliable source, no matter how "official" the page supposedly is, as stated here.

Also, please sign your posts when using talk pages, by typing four tildes like this: ~~~~. TheChrisD ^{Rants•Edits} 17:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Dream-crazy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dream-crazy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Britney Spears picture.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Britney Spears picture.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 01:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)