S12B3

Re: Critical exploration

The term look quite notable, so I don't think it should be much of an issue (yeah I know I'm not familiar with the term at all not having done advance psychology courses) but the main issue was the fact the article was more written like a personal essay or thesis work or some sort. Also see this section on the WP:SYNTH page.

I can give you links of other psychology articles just to give an indication how articles can/should be built. Now, understood though some of the articles have some issues.

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5

Since you only made 5 edits so far, maybe this link can help

Generally, it should be built with the intro to introduce the topic of critical exploration (a paragraph or two), then there should be a section on either the history or/then the explanation of the term/method/positions, etc (depending on the case). Maybe afterwards, there could be a section on the philosophers or experts familiar or who (although some of the stuff might already be in earlier sections though. That might be up to the Wikipedia:[Wikiproject Psychology] to decide how it can be built. Maybe sections or paragraphs on works if it's the case can be added. I see that a lot of the article contained large quotes which generally should be in the Wikiquote wikia though the most important quotes (hopefully not too long) can be included with the reference (see:WP:CITE). Maybe a bibliography section can be added as well citing the books or published works on the subject can be added. Those are just suggestions though.--JForget 03:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)