Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Joe@Bike.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:JoePelton@BikeCasino.jpg. The copy called Image:JoePelton@BikeCasino.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 18:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Joe@Bike.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 12:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging

edit

I have restored the image Image:JoePelton@BikeCasino.jpg, and tagged it as "GFDL-self". You can add this tag by editing the image page and adding the text {{GFDL-self}}. Please visit the image and make sure that you agree to the licensing terms- if not, just remove the {{GFDL-self}} from the page. Staecker (talk) 00:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Never mind- I just noticed a duplicate at Image:JoePelton@theBicycleCasino.jpg. Staecker (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is the licensing all correct now? (I'd like to prevent future deletions.) Thanks. --S7o7b7 (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)s7o7b7Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephanie Douglas (February 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, S7o7b7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Stephanie Douglas concern

edit

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephanie Douglas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Stephanie Douglas concern

edit

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stephanie Douglas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Stephanie Douglas

edit
 

Hello, S7o7b7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stephanie Douglas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply