Why am i wasting my time talking to retards?

Your post above and here constitute personal attacks. Withdraw them before you take any other action. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Actually, don't bother.
Upon further consideration, restoring the attack that caused you to lose your talk page access, going back to the page to make more personal attacks, and even this show that you're totally incapable of considering that maybe rules might even be a thing that could possibly apply to you. As that only reinforces my previous assessment, I'm blocking you indefinitely. (Plus, there's the possibility you're just ducking out in the hopes I'll forget about this). Ian.thomson (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Do not bother appealing the block unless you acknowledge that you (and only you) have behaved inappropriately. This isn't about article content, this is about your constant and continual:
To be unblocked, you will need to demonstrate (not just acknowledge, but explain how you) understand what behaviors got you blocked, what the problem is with them, and how you will avoid those behaviors in the future. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 09:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Your "proxy" doesn't matter. Doug Weller just hadn't revoked your talkpage access as I had before. I've remedied this. Bye. SQLQuery me! 03:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lithium Americas

edit
 

Hello, SGT-Craig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lithium Americas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply