SIRavecavec
September 2021
edit
Hello, I'm Bonadea. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Nyanardsan that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Again not really intended as an attack, just to say were not all same and we all react differently, yet, I kept myself and my message consistent and fluent! While the second person maybe just by now, realises that its possible to make mistakes, when we do so, at least let's stop defending them, not attacking those who make a stance for injustice as if you check now the Draft in question, other admins stated clearly that the article should had not even been rejected. So again, I am completely open to kind and happy people, yet disturbed people are humans too among us unfortunatelly. Viorel Cosmin Miron 20:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
editYou have been indefinitely blocked for persistent threats,[1] insults[2] and unwillingness or inability to understand what kind of a project Wikipedia is.[3] If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 21:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC).
SIRavecavec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please show me the exact threat(S) you speak about many of them that is 1st. 2nd show me the insults, if you know what an insult is in this case, this is all against your own articles please then see . There is a difference between ignorance and arogance, for beying arogant one cannot be denied, in that case you will end up here very bad, this is all just another power showcase, you people clearly have boredom or too much time to do this power games. Both BOLD and DO NOT TAKE IT PERSONALLY WERE IGNORED HERE FULLY , I feel like in a fascist virtual room, next is to cut my hands maybe for speaking my hearth Viorel Cosmin Miron 08:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The threats and insults were linked in the blocking admin's message above, and you're continuing to be unpleasant as you ask for an unblock. "Be bold" isn't an excuse to be rude to others. Declined, and I would suggest that you be very careful about how you word your next unblock request - unproductive, insulting, and/or incomprehensible unblock messages will just get your talk page access revoked. GeneralNotability (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Viorel Cosmin Miron 08:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
edit
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.