SJM2106

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Patrick's Catholic Church, Leicester (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Patrick's Catholic Church, Leicester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:St Patrick's Catholic Church, Leicester, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, SJM2106! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leicester's Whipping Toms has been accepted

Leicester's Whipping Toms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Patrick's Catholic Church, Leicester has been accepted

St Patrick's Catholic Church, Leicester, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (River Lin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating River Lin.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It's good enough to keep, but this article really needs sentence-by-sentence sourcing. I've added relevant categories and tags on the talk page, and linked to a pre-existing Wikimedia Commons category.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 22:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

St Peter, St Paul and St Elizabeth Catholic Church, Coughton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, St Peter, St Paul and St Elizabeth Catholic Church, Coughton, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Peter, St Paul and St Elizabeth Catholic Church, Coughton has been accepted

St Peter, St Paul and St Elizabeth Catholic Church, Coughton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 15:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about St Thomas More's Catholic Church, Leicester

Hello, SJM2106

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, St Thomas More's Catholic Church, Leicester, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Thomas More's Catholic Church, Leicester.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

I see that draft of this article was accepted, but I really cannot see that the building passes WP:GNG; so far as I am aware, there is no ruling that all churches are notable. I', sorry & do not wish to discourage one of the rare editrs who are not adding articles about kick-the-ball players or Norwegian death metal albums.TheLongTone (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

OK, I've read your comment on the AfD page, and would like to make three points. Firstly, imo the only claims to significance are those regarding its architecture. Being a local landmark leaves all mustard uncut; where I like the incinerator stack of a hospital is a prominent local landmark and I don't thing anybody in possession of their marbles would say it was truly notable. Secondly, and more important generally, it as generally a good idea to include plausible claims of notability before you publish the article. Thirdly, if your claims of architectural significance are to be convincing, they really need to be backed up by independant sources.TheLongTone (talk) 12:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I do see some issues with your claims however. Just because a landmark besrs little significance on a national level does bo mean it can't be noteworthy. Using examples of TV masts, each one appears to have a page dedicated to it despite bearing vedy little national importance so to claim that the building is less noteworthy purely because it is only a local landmark does not stand up to scrutiny, as surely if applied to a all wikipedia pages would see several pages removed. Secondly, it would be a reasonable idea to publish claims of importance when the article is first published. It did not occur to me to do so at the time. Finally, the sources which cite the architectural significance are independent. Taking Stock in no way is a local initiative, but is instead a national intitiative. And finally, you say that you do not wish to discourage wikipedia contributors who post more than just footballers etc. If this is really the case I suggest you take a less elitist attitude. SJM2106 (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

This will be my final post on wikipedia. I am sorry that I am not 'professional' enough for wikipedia, publishing only 'trivial' articles. I was foolish to think that I could in some way vary what has becone a monotonous and very banal project. I will leave it to people such as yourself, who is obviously a professional. My only advice is that you leave your mother's basement to get some fresh air now and then. SJM2106 (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

With all due respect, I think you are throwing your toys out of the pram. I applaud the efforts of any editor who adds articles or content which is not about football players or obscure pop music recordings; howere there are guidelines regarding notability and after thought I did not think that your subject satisfied them.

Incidentally, I think that {{St Peter and St Paul and St Elizabeth Catholic Church, Coughton]] is an excellent article.TheLongTone (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)