SMGeorge34

Learn more about this page

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Date formatting for opera articles

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for catching the strange duplicate "17" in the roles table.

I'd just point out that this article falls under Wikipedia:Wiki Project Opera guidelines where the d-m-y format is employed throughout all except some North American subjects. You can find details here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Opera/Article_styles_and_formats. Viva-Verdi (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the heads up, much appreciated. Point well noted and appreciated. SMGeorge34 (talk) 03:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi SMGeorge34, thank you for your hard work! I just wanted to give you a heads-up: a few of the links you have added as references are in fact not appropriate, for several reasons. It is important that the reference actually supports the text in the article, and e.g. the linkeddominator.com reference added in this edit does not support the text in the article at all. (The rest of your edit there is unproblematic, I refer only to the addition of a link to that domain as a reference.) In addition, the links in question are inappropriate per Wikipedia's external links policy. In addition to linkeddominator.com, the references using seofortlauderdale.org and marketmongoose.com have been reverted. If you feel that these websites are in fact reliable sources, you are welcome to discuss this on the reliable sources noticeboard, where many different editors provide their input on whether specific domains are useful sources. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 14:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SMGeorge34. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic