User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 107

Archive 100

←

Archive 105

Archive 106

Archive 107

Archive 108

Archive 109

Archive 110

October 2015

Please comment on Talk:2015 Thalys train attack

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Thalys train attack. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Resolved

 – Fixed

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bocce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criollo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 15:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 339 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

. Buster Seven Talk 15:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Congrats, SMC. Montanabw^(talk) 23:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, folks. The sick thing is, almost none of that 100K is WP:AWB; I haven't used it in years, and only for cleaning up small categories of articles like Category:Cue sports.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  01:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Update

 Done

You don't know me, but I just wanted to let you know I replied to your excellent comment from six months ago that you posted at the bottom of this talk page discussion. Have a good day. Czoal (talk) 19:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I commented there and suggested at WP:ANRFC that it be closed per WP:SNOWBALL.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  01:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

My pleasure. Yes, there was quite a snowstorm in that RfC. By the way, that debate actually stemmed from this condescending lecture I got from an editor on my talk page after I moved the template from the bottom of an article, where he had placed it, to the top. In any case, thanks for requesting the close. Czoal (talk) 08:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Are you sitting down?

 Done

Believe it or not, I'm popping by because I think your perspective may be useful here: Talk:Feral_organism#Requested_move_2_October_2015. Montanabw^(talk) 20:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

LOL. I'll have a look at it.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  22:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I went with Sminthopsis's idea, which retains all the info, but puts the animal stuff in its own article.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  01:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2015)

Stale

 – I didn't even notice this in time.

An example of musical composition – Scherzo in A flat (Borodin) Hello, SMcCandlish. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Musical composition Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Personal finance • Scottish mythology Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Talk:Special administrative region

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Special administrative region. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikigroan listed at Redirects for discussion

 Done

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikigroan. Since you had some involvement with the Wikigroan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:African American

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African American. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2015)

 Declined

 – Leading up to Halloween, everyone and their dog was already going to be editing that page.

Costumed performers from the 2006 Bristol Renaissance Faire Hello, SMcCandlish. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Costume Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Musical composition • Personal finance Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?

 On hold until 08:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

 – I have to defer this until later unless this request is received favorably.

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

As I think you know, I'm temporarily unable to contribute to that discussion. Thanks for the notice, anyway; I doubt that the issues surrounding the specific page section in question will resolve themselves somehow in a single month, so I'll probably weigh in on it after the TB expires.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  03:12, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Britain

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Britain. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

 Done

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Flags redux

 Done

Flags to right of them, flags to left of them, flags in front of them, flutter'd and wave'd.

SMcC, FYI: [1]. I trust you agree that tagging Russian ballet dancers with national flag icons is an inappropriate use. It's kind of funny, but whenever there's a MOS:ICON dust-up on the talk pages, it's always a sports-related article that is trotted out. Personally, I think national flag icons for ballerinas and dinosaur fossils are a lot more egregious, but I suppose there are those flag-waving apatosaurs and raptors that espouse nationalist tendencies too. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

@Dirtlawyer1: Can't do anything about it right now (see on-hold note).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  18:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Understood; I was thinking your t-ban only extended to editing MOS provisions, but broadly construed this obviously touches on MOS. Sorry to bother you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

No prob. I'm hoping the frequency with which people keep asking for my input on matters blockaded by the TBan will get the TBan lifted early, but so far the request has been sitting there for weeks. My guess is the TBan will expire before the request is acted upon. [shrug]. As for "broadly construed", the admin in question did in fact extend it directly to at least one article (even though that appears to violate the scope of WP:ARBATC), so I'm not taking any chances. The closest to a chance I'm taking is commenting on style matters in article talk from a strictly external-sources perspective, e.g. what Oxford /Hart's and Chicago say about comma usage.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  00:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Done, now that the TBan has been voided (and it would have expired by now anyway).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  03:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Denali

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Denali. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2015)

 Declined

 – When I edit sports articles, it's non-team sports like most cue sports; team sports already get way more attention than they need.

Ice hockey is an example of a team sport. Pictured is an 1893 ice hockey match at Victoria Rink, Montreal. Hello, SMcCandlish. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Team sport Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Costume • Musical composition Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

 Won't fix

 – It was intentional, as the HTML comment at that locus explains.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lusitanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Tribscent08 and Universal Medicine

Tribscent08 is a WP:SPA with ties tot he cult. Frankly, we need to start topic banning the two or three SPAs on that article, because all they ever do is beef about how it's not promotional enough neutral. It's a cult, it makes batshit crazy claims, Benhayon's daughter claims to have given tens of thousands of pounds' worth of swimming coaching as a donation in kind, in the UK chaorty accounts, but without any trace of any meaningful number of people actually using the swimming facility. It really is a scam. Guy (Help!) 22:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

@JzG: I don't doubt you (on any of that). I was just doing due "in case it's an earnest noob not an SPI" diligence in explaining how proper sourcing works here. :-) If only it were as easy to deal with lo-o-ong term "civil PoV pushers". Obvious promotionalists are way easier to get the community to do something about than more subtle WP:GREATWRONGS activists on long-game campaigns to manipulate our coverage (see, e.g., top item on my user page re: Pakistan). There's a lot of that going on with regard to GMOs, e-cigs, even linguistic matters. [sigh]  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh yes, this is very much the case. I am increasingly convinced that there will eventually have to be a body on Wikipedia that can make binding decisions on content. Guy (Help!) 23:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Surely. And we have a countervailing problem that all of the dispute-resolution mechanisms under WP:DR cannot be used except in a content dispute, other than running to ArbCom and spending a month pretending to be an attorney with a bunch of people pretending to be a court, or throwing the dice at ANI, where you will win or lose based on how popular you are with whoever shows up that day, and mostly as a factor of how good you are at being concise and sweet-sounding for the 15 seconds you have people's attention. This dual problem is insanely gameable. If you're a NOTHERE PoV-pusher, you can use one set of tactics and approaches to weasel and skew the content, dancing around the usual DR processes, but ultimately immune to ArbCom as long as you're good at the "civil-PoV" game; meanwhile using a different set of tactics to warp policy and processes (especially to make it easier to keep doing what you're doing to the content), knowing that there's almost no DR recourse available to stop you. All it takes is patience and skill at verbal manipulation to get your opponents to look like the bad guys, and political acumen in persuading people you're not really doing anything wrong. If this double-backdoor is not closed, it will eventually be the death of WP, because all the paid advocates, fringe loons, and propaganda agents will slowly become admins and take the place over, as they gain ground and force out actual encyclopedist editors who oppose them. This is an already ongoing, slow-motion coup d'état.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  06:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland)

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

‎Requesting guidance

 Done

Greeetings

It seems you have been working on culture related some articles too. I am requesting your kind guidance for change of name of one article. When I started working on a new article recently, presently named Poles in mythology actual article name was some thing different, actually due to some misunderstandings some one changed name of the article to Poles in mythology. Matter of the fact is I wanted to cover cultural aspects and festive celebrations as an umbrella article and wanted to have historical mythological, worships wherever concerned as a small part of the main article.

Poles in mythology is altogether a different subject when I am doing research and writing cultural aspects of festive celebrations are also coming up simultaneously and I am coming to a conclusion that for covering cultural aspects of festive celebrations of 'pole' we need to have a separate umbrella article altogether so we will not have more confusions and misunderstandings. Either we need to change present article name or split and create a new cultural aspect related article.

Please let me know your openion and if you are positive to my suggessions what should be the new articles name ? In fact you can join in discussion at Talk:Poles_in_mythology#Change_of_article_name

Looking forward to your kind guidance

Thanks and warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 10:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sofia

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sofia. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2015)

Stale

 – I thought about it, having an interest in this topic, but did not have time for it.

Models promoting Zombieland at San Diego Comic-con. A zombie comedy is a horror comedy subgenre that involves zombies. Hello, SMcCandlish. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Comedy horror Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Team sport • Costume Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

 Fixed

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ride-or-die chick

added links pointing to Dyke and Gold digger

Chicano

added a link pointing to European people

Colored

added a link pointing to Race

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach

 Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration proposed decision posted

 Done

 – Commented at its talk page.

A proposed decision has been posted in the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to. Comments are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)