SSIGGIE

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muneeb Faiq (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muneeb Faiq and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muneeb Faiq, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, SSIGGIE! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muneeb Faiq

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muneeb Faiq, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello SSIGGIE. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SSIGGIE. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SSIGGIE|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hi There. Thank you for your message. I am sorry to know that my edits have given the impression that I might have a conflict of interest in writing or editing the draft. I hereby confirm that I have not been directly or indirectly compensated in any form for any part of the writing. I am not related to the subject neither have I received any payment directly or indirectly for editing this draft. If you wish, you can move back the article to draft and we can work further to edit it and remove the puffery. Or maybe I stop editing it and let others edit the draft so that it is cleaned from the peacock words that I might have added to the draft. In the meantime, I will try to understand how we can write articles with neutral point of view. Thank you SSIGGIE (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Can you please explain how you became the copyright holder of this image then? Praxidicae (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The page has anyway been deleted. To answer your question; I am a journalist and I happened to be in the ceremony when the subject was named Emerging Vision Scientist at the Capitol Hill. Anyway! Thank you!SSIGGIE (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You are very humble and professional. VisionBiologist (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)