SSP-TPP

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Kings in a Cipher (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two Kings in a Cipher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Two Kings in a Cipher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, SSP-TPP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi SSP-TPP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, templates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Deric Angelettie

I read your message to me concerning Deric Angelettie. I'm in a bit of a hurry right now, I have a few short pointers:

1. You put a large number of external links directly in the body of the article. That's not how we do it. See Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Linking dos and don'ts.
2. Many of your links were unsuitable as sources. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources, WP:ALLMUSIC, WP:IMDB.
3. You used a large amount of bold and italic text in inappropriate ways. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting.
4. You added a long "Production Discography" that wasn't really suitable for an article.

My recommendation is that you take some time and read a number of other music biographies to see what they should be like. You can find a number of good examples in Featured articles#Music biographies. There are also some useful tips and hints in Wikipedia:Writing better articles.

Hope this helps! —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 12:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Deric Angelettie - gray jacket.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deric Angelettie - gray jacket.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Deric Angelettie, industry party d-dot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deric Angelettie, industry party d-dot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 05:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Npyka,

Thank you for your input, it was very appreciated. I was able to get the owner of the pic (now deleted pic) permission to use. I should have placed the pic under creative common license. I will be correcting this, but before I do, I would like to speak or zoom (at your convience) about some other concerns about Deric Angelettie page that I mimicked after Sean Combs page.

I do see some of my errors in re-creating the Angelettie page. I would like to ask you questions in real time so that I do not make the same mistakes.

thx

ssp tpage (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm not fluent in spoken English and have a fairly mediocre command of rules outside of image manipulation. You should ask your questions to WP:HELPDESK. — Ирука¹³ 21:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)