SStephens13

Welcome to Wikipedia and good work

Hi, I'm Oiyarbepsy and I can see fairies.

Welcome and thank you for joining and editing Wikipedia.

This is not an automated bot that placed this message. Yes, it is boilerplate, but it won't appear anywhere if I don't put it there. You are reading this because I've looked at your contributions and it's obvious that we'd like to keep you around.

If you have any questions, please click this link, then hit the new section and rock and roll. I really like to pretend to know what I'm doing here, so I'm sure I'll give you the right answer, and if I don't, you can whack me with a trout.

Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't know if this was directed to me, but I just wanted you to know that I lived in San Francisco (home of Wiki) for 36 years, so I saw a lot of fairies, too. American In Brazil (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

US Infobox

Hello, I'm just wondering why you remove the Treaty of Paris (1783) line? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnisome (talk • contribs) 22:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I tried to describe my reasoning in my edit summary, sorry if you didn't understand. The reason I removed it was that the Treaty of Paris did not have anything to do with the establishment of the United States. The United States was an independent country and would continue to be one whether Britain recognized it or not (the same way that Israel is a country despite some countries not recognizing it). So the Treaty of Paris isn't really significant in terms of the establishment of the United States, which is what the infobox should describe. Hope you understand. SS13 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Big Six (hockey)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Big Six (hockey), SStephens13!

Wikipedia editor Snabbkaffe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks! Great article.

To reply, leave a comment on Snabbkaffe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Thank you for your edits on Boston Bruins, and thank you for adding Big Six (hockey). You have shown great potential. Snabbkaffe (talk) 07:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

I didn't know that hockey had a Big Six. I know they have big sticks. American In Brazil (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Mary Anna Needell

Are the references adequate now? Can I take off the curation label? Thanks for reading this. I'll try to fill it out over the coming weeks. Bmcln1 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

I've tried cleaning up the references but the Ancestry.com one is not really a valid source. Ancestry.com has to get their information from somewhere else and it shouldn't be difficult to find out where. Other than that, the article also needs to clearer about why its subject is significant. But I'll remove the tag for now. SS13 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

A large number of commercially published novels in English is normally taken as notability. Bmcln1 (talk) 11:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Dalya Luttwak

I'm sorry, perhaps it's because I am new to creating Wikipedia pages. Is there a reason this page was marked for speedy deletion? I'm happy to make any adjustments. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ap0488 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Yes, I marked your page for deletion because its only reference is the subject's own website. Wikipedia articles need to have notability, and not having outside sources is usually a good indicator that the subject may not be notable. SS13 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy vs Wait and See

I've declined your speedy for no content at Meiling jin. Firstly, one minute after creation is a little fast, and secondly because there is content - but it's on the talk page. This is an educational course thing, and we do allow them some leeway in working. It's a bit like Scouting - the kids there rarely stay on and become leaders without a break, but some (just about enough) come back later. If people learn at school or uni about editing Wikipedia, they'll come back when the appeal of the pub has died down, the family is growing up, and the telly's getting even more unbearable - or even just when they spot a typo or some vandalism. They'll remember what to do and how. OK? Tag straight away for attack, spam, blatant hoax and copyvio. Give other things a bit more space. BTW I used to work in Edits by Recent Accounts (or Newly Created Accounts - something like that). There, I was often working up to 12 hours after the edit - but I used to pick up a lot of stuff that had been missed by those who were only a minute behind the author. Peridon (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Computationalredteaming

Hello, I am trying to create an article on Computational Red Teaming, which is an emerging area in the field of computational intelligence. I need more time to learn how to create a wiki page and to fill up the contents. Much appreciate If you could help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Computaionalredteaming (talk • contribs) 05:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have blocked this account as a username implying shared use, but given them general advice including how to set up an individual account. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Derka derka

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 23:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to M4 carbine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just typo raised by %5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[M16 rifle]], which were in turn adaptations of the [[AR-15]] rifle designed by [Eugene Stoner]] and manufactured by [[ArmaLite]]. The M4 is a shorter and lighter variant of the M16A2 [[assault
• {it icon}} {{Wayback |date=20110722030839 |url=http://www.colmoschin.it/page/carm4.asp |title=Armi > Fucili d'Assalto > Colt M4}}. colmoschin.it</ref> and Carabinieri Regiment "Tuscania"<ref>[[:File:2june2006 134.jpg]]<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Fortune Township

Hi i am Bittu Mondal Jhuruli, i created an article Fortune Township which was met for speedy delete. But it is very important because it is a township for people residents here. This article must needs to stay in Wikipedia. Please do not delete it and if it done then restore it.(Bittu Mondal Jhuruli (talk))

Merger discussion for Sprinkles

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sprinkles , has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Objectivesea (talk) 23:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Hartford Whalers roster

A tag has been placed on Template:Hartford Whalers roster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

roster is for a team that doesn't exist anymore, and is not transcluded on to any page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Canuck^{89 (have words with me)} 07:41, June 30, 2015 (UTC) 07:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hartford Whalers roster

Template:Hartford Whalers roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Canuck^{89 (converse with me)} 23:36, June 30, 2015 (UTC) 23:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Temple me

A tag has been placed on Temple me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Tewksbury ma listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tewksbury ma. Since you had some involvement with the Tewksbury ma redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of states and territories of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Kathleen Murphy (VA state representative)

hi,

you moved the page Kathleen Murphy to Kathleen Murphy (politician) on the grounds that: "a state representative is really not that important. My home state of NH has over 400. The majority around the country don't have their own individual Wikipedia articles."

In Virginia, state delegates are important. there are 100 state representatives and 8.3 million people, with each Delegate representing over 80,000 people. Additionally, many many other VA state delegates have their own Wikipedia pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Members_of_the_Virginia_House_of_Delegates

I don't see why you changed the article from Kathleen Murphy to Kathleen Murphy (politician). It seems to have just made the process for voters to find information more difficult.

Oghitta420 (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

It's a notability issue. The Virginian politician holds no relevance to anyone other than the 80,000 people she represents. Kathleen Murphy the businesswomen directly controls assets worth over

$1,700,000,000,000; and she consistently ranks as one of the most influential and powerful businesswomen in the world. I encourage you to do a quick Google news & image search for "Kathleen Murphy". The majority of the results are of the businesswoman. A normal Google search will give mostly results about the politician, but seemingly just because of Wikipedia results and her own campaign website. Though she is no doubt notable, I think she is not as notable as the businesswoman (though even if she is, she is certainly not so much more notable that a search for "Kathleen Murphy" should return the user to her page). SStephens13 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I see that that is well and good, but the first 13 Google results are for her. One has to go well into the second page to get to the businesswoman. It seems silly to have to redirect users. The majority of searchers will likely, then, be searching for the Virginian rather than the exec. I just want to revert to the idea that if it aint broke, no need to fix it. Oghitta420 (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I think your results must be due to the fact that you are in the Virginia area, and they are location driven results, as only 5 results on the first page for me are for the politician, while 3 are for the businesswoman. And virtually all the image results on the top of the page are of the business woman. After a quick Google Trends search, it seems that the businesswoman is the most searched for online and therefore I would suggest that she is definitely the more notable of the two. See for yourself: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=%2Fm%2F03c8bkt%2C%20%2Fm%2F012m5sxq&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B4 SStephens13 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snoqualmie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:US statehood dates page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SStephens13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Melissa Villasenor

Why did you move this page? Surely there is nothing against using diacritics in article titles, especially when she uses it herself. Nohomersryan (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Though personally I believe the use of diacriticals in personal names in the English language is always inappropriate, upon finding examples of this spelling in various English language sources and after reviewing Wikipedia:Manual of Style I have switched it back. SStephens13 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

I see, thanks for the prompt response. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Unexplained edits of Fireball Cinnamon Whisky

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Fireball Cinnamon Whisky does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SStephens13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

oar hockey team

It is actually the Russian national ice hockey team participating. They are credited as qualifying on the official olympic site, and oar is shown to have the ranking points of the russian national team. It is the NOC that is banned, not the participant. For the hockey teams we link to the national teams, just like it is still okay to link to Andrey Larkov (for example) when he competes in skiing we also link to the actual competitor in hockey. They are scoring ranking points toward qualifying in the next olympics for the Russian national ice hockey team.18abruce (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SStephens13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)