STUDIO3339

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:STUDIO3339/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:STUDIO3339/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, STUDIO3339! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia must not become ridiculous

Wikipedia must be a place where everyone will be able to corect the fake or wrong news ! I may not be able to corect that because i am new on it , but the editors of wikipedia will have no excuse... I just tried to corect the news about origin of Mannequin Challenge , with prove of dates and locations to not look ridiculous, but every time i tried someone take of my article... You must understand that Google will prove the origin of Mannequin Challenge with videos ! Those videos have the dates encrypted on it , so in the end Wikipedia will lose trust ...( I dont think you like that ) . If you really care about Wikipedia, dont let those bad people to throw the dirt on it , because they may do that on porpoise... In my sandbox you will find one article about Mannequin Challenge Origin ( with date and biography of the true autor ) So dont act like blind .... Google will prove that wikipedia published false news in the end .... That will make you happy ?????? STUDIO3339 (talk) 10:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi STUDIO3339! You created a thread called Wikipedia must not become ridiculous at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

User:STUDIO3339/sandbox

Hello, STUDIO3339. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:STUDIO3339/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)