253 (number)

edit

Why must it be redirected? That is a good question. And while not a newbie - I don't have an answer to that, but the article ]250 (number) does contain something about 253. Why don't you try the talk page at Talk:250 (number) and propose breaking out 253, but I think they will want a lot more than what has been proposed. In the mean time, continuing to redo the same edits doesn't get you anywhere around here - I've learned that too, the hard way. Good luck. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply