Saerain

Why did you bother editing the Great Toolset Disappoinment of '06? It filled the criteria of Wikipedia.org and was not vulgar in anyway.

Cauzway 10:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

See:

• Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
• The great toolset disappointment of '06 --Saerain 10:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Reverted change

Please be aware that by your recent change of "Templars" to "Templar"[1] that you broke several things on the page, including image links, and changing the titles of some books which use the word "Templars." I have restored the article to an earlier state. If you still feel strongly that the form "Templars" is incorrect, please bring up your opinions at the article's talkpage, thanks. --Elonka 21:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that was a hasty correction. I'm sorry, and thank you for bringing the problems it caused to my attention. --Saerain 04:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Copy-n-Paste Moves

Please do not make copy-n-paste moves as you did with Atlantean to Atlantean (TV movie trilogy). Copy-n-paste moves shouldn't be done as they disassociate the edit history which causes GFDL compliance issues. You should move pages instead. I have fixed this one. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 03:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Great userbox.

I like your userbox: {{User:Saerain/Userboxes/Accurate words}}. Great rebuttal to mine, and you make a compelling argument. All that while using the same word I used! Very creative, indeed. The point that I was making though, is that the human mind can be algorithmic, and can with one string think the more obscure, complex word; and with the other string think the simpler word. And then one would therefore weigh which word is the better to use. Sometimes people just throw those big words out there to impress, and alienate people who never were fortunate enough to receive those language skills. Whatever the circumstance may have been. Good userbox, though. Lighthead ^þ 07:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)