Sagibarzilay

Welcome!

Hello, Sagibarzilay, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Round the Bend (2012), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Round the Bend (2012)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Round the Bend (2012), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Advice re your article

Talk pages of deleted articles are not normally kept. This is a better place to give you advice and for you to ask any questions. The immediate cause of deletion of your page was copyright; that could be fixed, but there are more serious problems.

There are many sites like Facebook and Myspace which will be happy for you to promote your upcoming film, but Wikipedia is different - it is not a noticeboard for announcements, it is a project to build an encyclopedia. We maybe do not do enough to make that clear in advance. Because of the need for a neutral point of view, people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own projects, companies, films, bands etc. They are considered to have a WP:Conflict of interest, see also WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Also, as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is selective about subjects: the criterion is called Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?

New projects are often unable to meet that requirement, but an encyclopedia is not for announcing new things, only for describing things that are already established.

It is unlikely that a film will be able to show notability until it has been released and gathered independent reviews. There is more detail at WP:Notability (films): see particularly WP:NFF:

"Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. ... Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

So, sorry, best of luck with your film, but Wikipedia is not the place for you to write about it. JohnCD (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)