User talk:Sai varma sarikonda/sandbox

Draft review

I went through your article of social media analytics and suggested some contents which can be helpful. You have chosen a good content to be added to your article. Business Intelligence is a rising sector where everyone need to concentrate. Your sentences were meaningful and have proper citations as well. I noticed that you have discussed the same sentence in the beginning and ending of the paragraph.--Cranjithkumarreddy (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Review from Lavanya

I went through you draft Sai, the content which you mnetioned was clear, try add more content and keep the proper citations and good references to support your article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Durgalavanya (talk • contribs) 03:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

ARTICLE REVIEW

Hello Sai, you have chosen a very good topic to add in the article. Social media analytics in the business intelligence plays a important role in social media analytics. I would suggest you to collect more references as you can find many peer reviewed articles on the topics you selected. Business intelligence is the main concept in social media analytics, so carefully use all the sources.Stadepell (talk) 03:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

review the article ==== Peer Review

Hi Sai varma

The article social media analytic is very good topic and Business Intelligence is good part of that section, yes there is much you could add. The thing to remember is this metric is concerned with developing and evaluating information tools and frameworks to collect, monitor, analyze, summarize, and visualize social media data to be used to enhance business solutions. When expounding use has many resources and citations to support your position.

Larry 07:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)<lunchmeat30"" />Larry 07:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lunchmeat30 (talk • contribs)

Peer Review

Hello Sai

The article begins with the definition and explanation of social media analytic but it contains very diverse information from various dimensions that the article is unable to clearly state its point of view to the readers. The other flaws in the article are as follows. • It is a very short and precise article. • Very insufficient information is available in the article. • All the references are taken from online sources, and no peer reviewed article is used for collecting data. • The practical implications for social media analytic are also not discussed. Despite these flaws there are also some errors in the content and these errors need to be removed from the text in order to increase the validity and authenticity of the article. So it is identified by critically reviewing the article. There is no use of pictures and graphics in the article to clearly explain the positive and negative impact of social media analytic2602:306:377E:F340:6868:1EDD:E811:DB46 (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC). Also, the article fails to explain how the social media analytics impact the corporate world and various industries. The definition and the explanation of social media analytics is too narrow and precise that it is unable to explain the exact meaning and the concept of the social media analytics. Moreover, there is lack of resource and also the author is unable to meet the expectations of the readers. The nature and scope of social media analytics is also not been discussed and how the organizations in future will take measures for social media analytics. Hence, a lot of information is missing and the article lacks extensive details. Haifa Alburek 2602:306:377E:F340:6868:1EDD:E811:DB46 (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hey Sai,

Nice development in the article. I would like to recommend you to add some example of the softwares that are used for social media analytics. You can choose some IBM tools as an example. Asmat (talk) 02:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)