Sakura sadath
June 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Roundish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Firmographics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (Roundish ⋆t) 19:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles are about one particular usage. We don't cover different usages of a term in a single article - this is one way an encyclopedia differs from a dictionary. You should stop adding marketing-specific definitions to articles which are about something else. - MrOllie (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sakura_sadath, you might want to skim WP:what wikipedia is not. I found some of the sections very helpful when I was new. (Roundish ⋆t) 22:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm OutsideNormality. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cross-selling seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OutsideNormality (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Upselling. Adakiko (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.