Salem Leo

Welcome!

Hello, Salem Leo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2602:306:3357:BA0:2DCC:2A84:9C2E:FBB3 (talk) 23:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

---

Coins of the United States dollar----

I'm curious why you listed the three cent bronze coin as "not circulated". Given that the mintage was only a few dozen pieces and AFAIK there were no plans to actually circulate the coin, I'd think it was more accurately listed as a pattern. However, I didn't want to change it without knowing why you classed it as you did. thanks, Scott. Almostfm (talk) 06:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Got your message. I wouldn't say it's a "mistake"-it's a bit of a judgment call sometimes over where "pattern" stops and "not circulated" begins. The 1974 aluminum cent is a good example. They struck some as patterns, but later minted another million. If the coin had gotten congressional approval, the million they minted would have been released for circulation. Since, AFAIK, there's no difference between the coins that were actually struck as patterns and the million that were intended for circulation, there's no way to distinguish between them. take care, Almostfm (talk) 04:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Native American Dollar Coin Program

Hello! There is a discussion here, with references for the continual minting of the Sacagawea/Native American US $1 coins after 2016 (i.e., after the end of the Presidential $1 Coin Program this year). The Native American Coin Act does not explicitly state that the Native American $1 Coin Program will end in 2016, if I am mistaken, please kindly source the original quote. Meanwhile, I have quoted the US Mint's official website as my source for the continuance of the Native American $1 Coin Program. I quote (bolding is my own): "Following the conclusion of the Presidential $1 Coin Program, the Native American $1 Coins will be issued in any order determined to be appropriate after consultation with the U.S. Senate Committee ...". In the edit summary of one of your reversions, you made mention of the [cancellation] due to [the] lack of demand, if this is true, please kindly provide a reliable source for this. Thank you! --Shibo77 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Byzantine Empire into Roman Empire. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

To enforce an arbitration decision and for making an edit known to be contentious without obtaining the required "firm consensus", in violation of the sanctions already in effect on the page United States presidential election, 2016, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

October 2016

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Your recent edit to the page Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Salem Leo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1863 Three cent bronze pattern, obverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1863 Three cent bronze pattern, obverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1863 Three cent bronze pattern, reverse.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1863 Three cent bronze pattern, reverse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)