Salperwy

August 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 14:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

I will try to improve. I am a researcher working in a European project, my goal is not to do advertising of some vendors but more to help people do a good choice for choosing their IIoT infrastructure (choosing/recommending was part of my job this last 10 years).

I am trying to do smaller increments now as I would like to contribute on 3-4 sections. 2A01:E0A:E16:D470:B9F2:9F6E:B787:7EFC (talk) 10:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:RS thoroughly - you have been inserting a lot of selfpublished sites as sourcing, and that's not really going to work. Also, please focus on prose edits - inserting a superfluous table into the middle of the article is not a good idea. MrOllie (talk) 12:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Now you appear to be citing sources that do not actually verify the content you are adding. Please stop. MrOllie (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Well the existing references on Big Data, ML, AI... don't mention IIoT either, but IIoT use cases fit perfectly all what Big Data is about in the reference. Is industry 4.0 different than IIoT in your opinion?

Could you explain why you remove the section about PV industry too? The reference described an IIoT system... if you prefer we can reference a less referenced paper but with better keywords such as: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8476807 Salperwy (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Is this IIoT or not in your opinion?

"The aim of the paper is to have an overview of different monitoring systems used or proposed for PV installations around the world focusing on monitoring important parameters following consumers demand as well as researchers’ aspects, also to review the communication technologies used for different monitoring systems, to provide possible notes on pros and cons of the systems, and lastly to propose an alternative solution to meet all basic requirements of monitoring system for PV installation in easy manner." Salperwy (talk) 20:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

My opinion doesn't matter. The source needs to explicitly support the content in question. If I have to interpret it or form an opinion of my own, it doesn't do that. MrOllie (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

So it is better to have a more recent source with the new/fancy keywords than older one that fit better the wikipedia page content so that people can see explicitly the links between the source and the wikipedia article. That's a bit sad but I can try to comply to that. 2A01:E0A:E16:D470:6934:F829:3B36:3A8C (talk) 06:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)