SamRathbone

"What can possibly go wrong?" I said when I socked.

WP: "EVERYTHING"

My point:

"What can go wrong, will go wrong."

SO

i very formally request you not to because i am t...DON'T

SOCK

Speaking from experience as you may have noticed.

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SerialNumber54129 18:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Might I enquire how this works? SamRathbone (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kathmandu Kings XI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathmandu Kings XI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathmandu Kings XI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 08:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Western Troopers

The article Western Troopers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable domestic cricket team. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't cite any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abishe (talk) 13:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Inbetweeners characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fingering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Great, ta for the info. SamRathbone (talk) 09:43, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Western Troopers

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Western Troopers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Western Troopers where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. buidhe 15:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Ight, I'll get crackin'. SamRathbone (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Western Troopers

Hello, SamRathbone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Western Troopers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

My request for a clean slate.

To whomever it may concern, this is Sam on his new account. I made this account when I was 8. I at first wanted to contribute meaningful articles as soon as I realised the world of Wikipedia was well and truly my oyster, yet soon used it for fun and became somewhat good at doing so. The problem was that I made myself a nuisance to other Wikipedians and readers of the site. I only realise this now as when I used this account for the last time, I was 12. I'm now nearly 16.

To anyone I angered in any manner, administrators, readers, the volunteers that constantly gave up their time to deal with a sixth-grader on his Raspberry Pi, I am sorry. I want to make that clear because no part of me views my conduct around that time as acceptable, justifiable, useful, or okay. I got myself into a situation that I should never have gotten into and I am angry at having done so.

I have matured greatly since this. I would like to request a complete clearing of my old user page and of my talk page, if that's considered okay. I can't get into this account because it's globally locked (damn), but I feel like it needs a refresh. Just to distance myself from the human I once was. Some sixth graders are stupid, some are annoying, I was both, in equal, and inquantifiable measure.

I want to start again. It would mean a lot if someone, anyone, could clear this account and make it visually not indicative of any past wrongdoing. I mean a LOT.

If anyone who's dealt with me in the past is seeing this, I want to offer you my profound apologies for all that was done. You gave up your time to try to deal with a kid whose age wasn't even in double figures and that goes a long way in terms of judgement of character. Well done, thank you, respect.

Sam, over and out. Buster of Ghosts (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)