Please discuss such changes on the talk page of the article before making them. Best wishes, — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- I cant write on your page seems.. So Mr. Headless Nick, where on earth my edits are not neutral when there is a clear indication that in the version that you want us to read there is a hiding of the fact that:
a) The people who got burnt "alive" as the article says were not mere Hindus who were travelling on a family trip. Those killed were coming back from participating in a communally sensitive event in Ayodhya organised by Modi's party.
b) The final reports of the enquiry committee is still to be out and there have been at least two enquiries that have not come up with a comprehensive reason as to whether the fire started from within (through the stoves being used by the Activists) or out of the train
c) Your wordings are too final and unsupported by any facts that "Muslim fundamentalists burnt the Hindus alive", You use an Israel based Think Tank's report to support your point of view when clearly there are loads of artlicles published by Indian papers that speak the truth.
The modus operandi of a group of writers in Indian articles is clearly to tag team together to exhaust the other POV's. Someone needs to look into the people who blank out the sourced stuff from the Indian Right wing parties pages on Wikipedia.You all are a CANCER Samarpan11 (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 00:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)