Samdilya
Welcome
edit
|
I have reverted your edit; the contributions were sourced, whereas your edits did not have reliable sources. If you continue your slow edit war you run the risk of being blocked from editing; consider this a friendly warning. If you want to change something, engage the topic on the pertaining talk-page.
Lectonar (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me, that reference is the "Shakhname" myth-tale by Persian poet Firdawsi. Can you just read the first page of the Second Part, where he talks about Turan. There he clearly indicates that Turan was the land populated by Turks and he was going to give it to his son Tur. Clearly Turan was not named after the name of that son. And secondly, "Shahkhnameh" is a myth about never existed Persian king who ruled the Earth for 500 years! So that is NOT a RELIABLE SOURCE at all. We are talking about clear geographic region, not a mythical kingdom. Why you are ignoring so many posted arguments clearly explaining wrongfullness of making Turan a part of Iran? Do you think you can ignore others and yet give out warnings to others? --Samdilya (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)