Samrush
June 2012
edit
Please do not add your own bias to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Family International. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. QU TalkQu 17:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Family International shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Your edits are a carbon copy of User:Samantha1rouge - I suspect you are the same real person. You are not permitted to continually revert to your own preferred version of an article. You must discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page. QU TalkQu 17:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Family International. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)