February 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Babyface (musician) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Concerned

edit

I must say I'm concerned about these edits that you made to the George P. Fletcher page. You seem to have removed a portion of a list of books and academic papers he has authored. You left no edit summaries, and no comments on the talk page. Why did you feel that vast quantity of material should be removed? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

They are not actually notable and you can read this. Those entries looked like a directory. SamuelDay1 (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the quick response; I was merely concerned about seeing so much vanish with no edit summary or talk page note, especially since I had thought it was normal in articles about academics and authors to include a list of their published works (or at least their significant ones). I see you did leave some books, and I haven't looked into every book or article to see if it's significant; but I do wonder about some of the articles. Disenfranchisement as Punishment, for example, has been cited in legal literature at least 91 times, including in a case.
At any rate, I was more curious as to your reasoning than anything else. Thanks again for the response. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SamuelDay1. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! NeilN talk to me 18:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Contested close

edit

Hi. I’d like to ask you to revert your closing of a discussion. Please see the replies at WP:ANRFC#Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)#RFC: Series subject as a name. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Closure review has been requested at WP:AN#Review request for non-admin closure at WT:NCF. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ANI closure

edit

Hello,

I'm leaving a message to let you know that I have reverted your closure at the administrators' noticeboard. It appears that you have already contributed to the discussion and closures should be left to an uninvolved individual. Best, Mike VTalk 00:53, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notify

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.109.203.252 (talk) 09:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions notification - CAM

edit
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Callanecc They are not talking about any alternative medicines or Acupunture, users are having a level of dispute over the word 'quackery' and calling him a conspiracy theorist. How that is related to these sanctions? SamuelDay1 (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
The quackery they are talking about is considered by some to be complementary and alternative medicine. And some of the conspiracy theories are related to complementary and alternative medicine. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes there are large amount of conspiracy theories, not only about medicines but also many other unrelated categories. Got it now that the page is under sanctions. SamuelDay1 (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Closures

edit

Please sign when you close a discussion. The one at Arab Spring is unsigned. Also please add a   Done template at the AN Requests for closure thread after closing. Thanks. Kraxler (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

edit