User talk:Sandiyenguyen/sandbox

Article evaluation

The article itself was relevant to the article topic with adequate amount of information. The information presented seemed appropriate and correct, and the citations were properly distributed and worked properly. The article did not seem biased of the author's feelings towards the topic, and was neutral with just stating facts. The information is up to date, but there is always new discoveries and new information being put out that makes everything have room for improvement. The talk page I found was helpful with the article because people were able to put their input on what the think is correct and what needed improvement. The article has is rated good/featured which means it is a reliable article with high views. The wikipedia speaks facts about the article and demonstrates the article's full potential compared to in class discussions.

Sandiyenguyen (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)sandi nguyenSandiyenguyen (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)