Sandos
Anti-Lamenessing Engine
editGreetings! I came upon Anti-Lamenessing Engine completely randomly, and I was wondering if you could assert its notability. I googled it but found that it didn't come up with a great number of hits, so I'm worried that other users might find it non-notable and therefore a candidate for speedy deletion: An article on the topic of a person, group of people, band, company, club or website that does not even assert the notability of that topic can be deleted without argument . GinaDana 06:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I would clearly say it is notable, but thats me and I could be biased. Its been around for quite awhile, and it is usable. It is pretty unknown though, I still would not say it is unnotable. Oh well. Sandos 18:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Think you could flesh out the article more? The guidelines say that notability has to be asserted within the article. GinaDana 02:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Anti-Lamenessing Engine
editI have nominated Anti-Lamenessing Engine, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Lamenessing Engine (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sandstein 04:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Sandos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Sandos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Game Boy family for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Boy family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.