Sangatfoundationcap

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Sangatfoundationcap", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 20:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I get you'll try to be as neutral as possible, but you also can't have a name that represents your company. Also, if you are paid, you must disclose whose paying you as well. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I think my user name does comply. It contains my name and represents me individually.Sangatfoundationcap (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@67.85.37.186: This person's username is acceptable per WP:ISU because it clearly denotes an individual within the company. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Depends on how you space it-I still see a promo username. Anyway, you must disclose paid editing. Or else I'll give you more paid warnings. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

@67.85.37.186: The user made a paid editing declaration on their userpage already, a day before your last message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

What you're going to need to do

1. Go to your user page (User:Sangatfoundationcap) and fill out the following template there: {{paid|user=Sangatfoundationcap|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
2. Consider that if your company really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author. If your company do not want other people to write about it, then starting an article is a bad idea.
3. Make sure the company's notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.
4. Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources about the company you can find. Also, while search engine results are not sources, they are where you can find sources. Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources. Press releases are not independent and so are useless -- don't waste your time with them.
5. Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon nor affiliated with the company, but still specifically about the company and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the company is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.
6. Summarize those sources you kept after step 5, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer. Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even the company's competitors can agree with.
7. Combine overlapping summaries where possible (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports), repeating citations as needed.
8. Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism. Do not copy and paste text from any source. Even if you have permission to use that text, other people on this site do not.
9. Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.
10a. If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make edit requests on the article's talk page.
10b. If the article is rejected, there will be aa reason given. Read it carefully and closely. If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.

Ian.thomson (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please disclose paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sangatfoundationcap, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sangatfoundationcap|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

You haven't edited, but please declare. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Sangatfoundationcap, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sangatfoundationcap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FC logo 2020.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC logo 2020.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)