Sangita Kumari1

Welcome!

Hello, Sangita Kumari1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your article कॉज और एफेक्ट वेब

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page कॉज और एफेक्ट वेब to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Everymorning (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of कॉज और एफेक्ट वेब

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on कॉज और एफेक्ट वेब, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Collective intelligence

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Collective intelligence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Coretheapple (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Collective Intelligence essay

Hi there,

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. The information you added to the article on collective intelligence looked to be interesting material. However, as presented it isn't really appropriate for an encyclopedia article. You may want to see these pages: WP:NOTESSAY and WP:TONE. If you're making arguments about what should be, making novel connections between subjects, evaluating the state of education, etc., that's considered original research, even if you cite source (thank you for citing sources, by the way). Wikipedia should only summarize what the sources say, not offer evaluations of sources or their content (except via other reliable sources which give such explicit evaluation). Wikipedia also shouldn't have conclusions drawn from sources that aren't expressly given within the sources and shouldn't make connections across multiple sources. It gets tricky. If you'd like to know more, feel free to ask here or at WP:TEAHOUSE. The Teahouse is a place for new users to ask questions.

Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Holistic education under collective intelligence

Sangita, I see that the section you contributed got deleted. Is it possible to add it again after changing the article to encyclopedic one? Anu Divakaran (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)