Your submission at Articles for creation: Seethalakshmi Prakash (May 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 03:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sankarnair2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 03:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Sankarnair2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Seethalakshmi Prakash, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jupitus Smart 03:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seethalakshmi Prakash (June 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Seethalakshmi Prakash moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Seethalakshmi Prakash, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 10:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for your message. There's nothing much I can do, gatekeeping is a fairly common issue on Wikipedia and suspicion of wrongdoing is often seen as good enough to stomp on newcomers or people with a single-purpose type of contribution (like yours; the subject is the only contribution you did on here so far, and it's a on living person - that rings quite a few bells).
I'd advise waiting for Ms.Prakash to have a couple more press appearances (and there's nothing against citing Malayam press, so use that as well), and submit again. Or go straight for that other topic you mention on your user page (skipping the AfC process altogether). Popo le Chien throw a bone 08:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seethalakshmi Prakash has been accepted

edit
 
Seethalakshmi Prakash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I am a new contributor and plan to contribute more.
Thanks again - we all do this as a service. Sankarnair2 (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:KunchikuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar

edit

  Hello, Sankarnair2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KunchikuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:KunchikuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar

edit
 

Hello, Sankarnair2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KunchikuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Seethalakshmi Prakash for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seethalakshmi Prakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seethalakshmi Prakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mcbath (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I will research more sources and resubmit - but it will take a month or two. 67.86.25.24 (talk) 13:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar (August 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar (December 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar

edit

  Hello, Sankarnair2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 18:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KunchaiKuttyPilla Sarvadhikaryakkar (October 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thilsebatti (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply