Welcome

edit
Hello, Sarahbingham56! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Pudendal nerve entrapment

edit

You are edit warring and transgressing the wp:3RR rule on pudendal nerve entrapment. You are also inserting unsourced data while removing sourced data. Stop or an admin will block you. RxWatch (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

  This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pudendal nerve entrapment, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The page is protected to protect both you and the page - please have a look at some of the policies in the standard welcome template I will put after this note.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Sarahbingham56. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 00:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Vandalism

edit

I would like to know why my contributions to pudendal nerve entrapment were deemed as 'vandalism'? The article on vandalism on wikipedia states

Even if misguided or ill-considered, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism. For example, although reinserting it despite multiple warnings can be disruptive, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article is not vandalism. However, edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism, but edit warring. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful thought may be needed to decide whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.

Also when will I be able to edit the article on PNE? (````)

Generally, people will accuse you of vandalism if you delete cited (sourced) information from an article based on your personal opinion. If you disagree with something, then provide sources for the disagreement and go to the article's talk page to discuss the merits and reach a consensus with editors who may disagree with your take. RxWatch (talk) 04:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply