User talk:Sarahj2107/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Your GA nomination of Shimna River

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shimna River you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I JethroBT -- I JethroBT (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shimna River

The article Shimna River you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shimna River for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know.

Nice work, Sarah. Had a lot of fun learning about the river while doing this GA! :) I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 13:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, and thank you for taking the time to review it. Your comments and suggestions were very helpful. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

again

Hi In the have me been insulted here, simply. But you do not understand your personality and human effort Brigadier human character into question. I just tried to get better, but you do not see. I've compiled source. No copyright Freedom here is, I work hard and I am positive... Irmovies (talk) 10:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

The matter is being discused at WP:ANI. I will let the admins deal with this now as you had previously been given a final warning about pasting copyrighted material into articles. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mashhadi Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Fractional Brownian motion

Back in April, you proposed merging Fractional Brownian motion of order n with Fractional Brownian motion: see Talk:Fractional Brownian motion. The current vote is 4-0. Perhaps the merge is worth doing?
86.152.239.213 (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me about this. I have gone ahead and merged the articles. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!   81.152.161.64 (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

The Islington

Hello Sarah .. Thank you for reviewing and (possibly cleaning up!) The Islington as an entry. I am very new to Wikipedia and need to understand what you need from me in order to prove to you that "The Islington" is one of the most profile Live Music Venues in London. I have referenced sources from The Independent newspaper, one of the biggest daily newspapers in the United Kingdom. I started with what I know and would be greatly appreciate if you could guide me as to what is needed to verify this entry.

I have been looking at other music venues in London and I know they have pictures (I can do that .. I just need to learn how to do it!) .. But some of the other London venue entries seem to have next to nothing in terms of National Daily newspaper references. I have included quite a lot.

Please let me know what you need, and what I can do to show you. I have the information, I just need to know exactly what's needed, and how to upload etc.

Yours,

Scott.

Hi Hippy Muffin, The issue is basically what Everymorning has said on your talk page. You need to add reliable sources which talk about the venue itself and not just make a passing mention to it. The relevant notability guidelines are at Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)#Buildings and objects and Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline if you want to read them. If you can find appropriate sources then I will be happy to withdraw my nomination for deletion. If you need anymore help with anything just let me know. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Hippy Muffin: - I saw this article at AfD, having done a few music venue related articles such as Denmark Street and Black Prince, Bexley myself. By far the best sources you can use for these sorts of articles are reports from the local council; however even a search on "site:islington.gov.uk "1 tolpuddle street"" brings up little more than just confirmation of the building's existence. It really doesn't help that the venue's had so many names, either (the notability of the Black Prince rests entirely on events decades ago). If we can't find anything else, then the article's likely to be deleted. Sorry. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

It's ready

I've created the page here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sarahj2107. It's ready for you to fill in the blanks.--v/r - TP 04:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

I've added my co-nomination as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 06:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

If you want to avoid linking to dab pages, see User:Anomie/linkclassifier for a very useful script. Just follow the instructions there to install it. I've been using it for years, both in Monobook and Vector skins, and can strongly recommend it - makes links to dab pages – and lots of other useful stuff – very obvious. Regards -NSH002 (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, that looks really helpful. I'll give it a go. Sarahj2107 (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The way you deal with other editors makes me confident you'll pass. Good luck and keep up the good work. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 07:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Precious

rivers and places of Northern Ireland
Thank you, Sarah-Jane, for quality articles such as Shimna River, adding "only to things I know a lot about", such as biomedical science and rivers and places of Northern Ireland, for gnomish project work, for welcoming and warning new users, and your readiness to clean even more as an admin, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congraulations on passing your RfA unopposed and with over 100 supporters! (Unless someone feels the need to put something in the oppose section, but they don't have too much time left.) --Biblioworm 15:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Congrats Sarah!--v/r - TP 16:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your request for adminship

Hi Sarahj2107, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations on your success, your unanimous support and for your place on WP:RFX100! As always, the administrators' reading list is worth a read and the new admin school is most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere. Good luck with your adminship! Acalamari 17:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations on your unopposed RfA! :) --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 17:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Well done! No doubt someone will turn up with your shiny new T-shirt before too long.  Philg88 ^♦talk 17:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Congrats again, Sarah. Very well done.--v/r - TP 17:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict)x2 Congrats on the unanimous RFA! ///EuroCarGT 17:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, Sarah. Best of luck with your new mop. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

• Congrats, new admin. If you need any help, feel free to ask at User talk:TParis. :) Drmies (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• (ecx2) Your T-shirt has arrived. --Biblioworm 18:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Congrats! --j⚛e decker^talk 19:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Congratulations. Thanks also for proving that RfA is no longer the 'horrible and broken process' it used to be. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Congrats, that was an awesome RFA! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks everyone for your support. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Husayn Fawzi Alnajjar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page California University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Javier Zugarramurdi

Hello Sarah, I want to know why you deleted the page Javier Zugarramurdi. Just tell me what do I need to add or modify in the page to be ok.

Many thanks, L. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagasta (talk • contribs) 10:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lagasta. I deleted the page because the consensus found during the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Zugarramurdi was that there were no independent, reliable sources to prove that Javier Zugarramurdi is notable enough to have a page on Wikipedia.

If you were to recreate the page you would need to provide references from reliable secondary sources which talk about him in significant detail (i.e. not just a passing mention). I suggest you read the pages I have linked to above to get a better idea of what is needed. You also might want to try using the article for creation process next time; you should get some advice there on how to improve it before it's moved to the main space. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sarahj2107 the links are there. Most important is the discogs link that show that the artist have proven releases. http://www.discogs.com/artist/1805823-Javier-Zugarramurdi Is also important to say that this artist is the first electronic music producer on taking the Afro-Uruguayan genre Candmobe to create unique electronic music with those rhythms. So I think is really important to include the article in wikipedia since Is the only article mentioning the fusion of Candombe and electronic music. I have a back-up of the article and I can re-create it now.

Many thanks for your time! Your admin T-shirt is nice : )Lagasta.

The discogs link is not enough to prove notability. If the other claims of importance are true then you need to provide reliable sources to prove it. I strongly advise against just recreating the article as it will likely be speedily deleted. If you disagree with my close of the deletion discussion you can take it to deletion review. If you do recreate it then you should use the Article for Creation process as I mentioned above. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Sarahj2107. You have new messages at Jersey92's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Sarahj2107. You have new messages at Jersey92's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mark Bynov

Hey, I'd like to know out your reasoning behind the deletion of page Mark Bynov and why you did not agree with what I contested. PatriarchPahom (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi PatriarchPahom. I deleted the page because it did not give a valid claim of significance and therefore quailified for speedy deletion under A7 criteria. Stating that he is a youtube personality is not a claim of significance and the fact that other similar articles exist does not mean this one should. If you think that I didn't follow Wikipedia guidlines and policies when deleting this page, you can bring it up at WP:deletion review. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, so a YouTube personality is not significant enough, no matter the amount of subscribers and views. If a person is covered by news sites, is that enough to be considered "significant"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatriarchPahom (talk • contribs) 19:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Chakloo

Looks good, I've removed a repetition of "two" and a weasel word. "Muslim priest" reads a bit oddly, maybe "holy man" or "imam"? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I have changed Muslim priest to imam. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

New aviation accident article

Hello Sarah. Thank you for creating your new article about the 1937 Australian National Airways Stinson crash. This fills a conspicuous gap in our coverage of notable aircraft accidents in Australia.

Please notify your new article to members of the Aviation Wiki Project by listing it at WP:NEWAIR. (There is a sub-section titled new aircraft accident articles.) Keep up your good work! Dolphin (t) 11:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Fazilmir

Would you mind clarifying why the article was deleted, preferably at WP:Requests for undeletion#Fazilmir? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jéské Couriano:Sorry, I pressed the wrong key. I meant to enter the edit summery of WP:CSD#G!1 and WP:CSD#A7. I clarified this when I deleted the talk page. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank'ee. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Elsevier access

Hello, Sarahj2107. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Nitesh Estates Limited Wikipedia Page

Nitesh Estates Limited is public listed company then how can it be not notable. Yes, I agree the content is promotional but that can be modified as not all content was promotional. The content that have proper references and are fact based can at least be put in this article. Also, if a company is notable then its wikipedia page must exist. Instead of removing the complete article we can work to modify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jolly.smith (talk • contribs) 05:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

@Jolly.smith: I sorry but the result of the deletion discussion was to delete it in its current form. The reasons given by other editors for this were that it lacked notability, was promotional in nature and contained copyright violations. If you disagree with the way I closed the deletion discussion and would like another opinion then you can take it to deletion review. However, your best chance of getting this article on Wikipedia in the future would be to start a draft in your sandbox. Make sure that it is written in a neutral tone with nothing that could be considered promotional, do not include anything copied directly from another source, and include plenty of reliable, independent, sources which talk about the subject in detail. Once your draft is finished another editor can review it and move it to the main space if they think it's ready. If you need any help with it or have any questions then just let me know and I'll try my best to help you. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Request for undeletion #Nitesh Estates Limited

A lot of conflicts are there with "Nitesh Estates Limited" so, please modify the data that are not required or seems to be promotional over here instead of deleting the page on daily basis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bahrunsuri (talk • contribs) 09:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Elsevier

Hi. I wanted to update you on the status of your Elsevier account. I sent the first list to Elsevier on 12 January. Elsevier reports that they will be e-mailing applicants next week with an access code, which will start your use of the resource. I appreciate your patience with this process. Feel free to contact me with any feedback or questions you have about Elsevier access. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Adryenn Ashley

Adryenn Ashley deletion.--I am going to start a new article on this lady. I think that the other was spammy and horrid but she truly is quite noteworthy and has done some amazing things, including one that is very dear to my heart. She's a producer and has a new company that is worth 10M in under 100 days but the best thing she's done is took down an entire domestic violence policy of a whole state and they adopted a new one from the California Alliance of Families and Children. Do you have an issue with a new article that connects to noteworthy news releases like PBS and the state of California if I do the article over again? Ladymacbeth9 (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Adryenn Ashley deletion.--I am going to start a new article on this lady. I think that the other was spammy and horrid but she truly is quite noteworthy and has done some amazing things, including one that is very dear to my heart. She's a producer and has a new company that is worth 10M in under 100 days but the best thing she's done is took down an entire domestic violence policy of a whole state and they adopted a new one from the California Alliance of Families and Children. Do you have an issue with a new article that connects to noteworthy news releases like PBS and the state of California if I do the article over again? Ladymacbeth9 (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ladymacbeth9, I don't have a problem with you creating the article again if you can add independent, reliable sources which mention her in significant detail (See General notability guidelines) I had a quick look an couldn't see any improvement in the sources available since it was deleted 3 months ago but if there are news articles then that would probably be enough for now. You should be aware though that press releases are not appropriate sources because they are not independent (I did see quite a few of them). I suggest you create a draft in your user space first and let someone review it before moving it to the main space, otherwise there is a chance it will just get deleted again. Let me know if you want me to take a look at it are if you need any help. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Sarah. I agree. The reality is that whoever wrote that article didn't research well. There were some good resources out there, which I found out after I said it wasn't really noteworthy. The press releases and things that they've done themselves, are of course not good resources, which is common sense--but that never seems to kick in when creating these pieces.I've been writing professionally and citing sources for 20 years. None of them ever included press releases written by the team of the "notable." I honestly think that someone (dare I say it) may have compensated them for that article and they slapped it up and called it good. It wasn't good work and it certainly had no measure of verisimilitude on any level. Ladymacbeth9 (talk) 07:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Removal of a page

I was wondering why you removed the page for Katlynn Smith aka, Katlynn Simone. I went to search new information, and the page shows to be removed by you if I'm reading this correctly. She is a recording artist, singer/songwriter, actress (BET's "The Game"), and model (JC Penny's, etc) She has music on Vevo, Music Choice, iTunes, Amazon, and a verified Twitter etc.

Hi. I deleted the page because that was what was decided as the deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Katlynn_Simone). The consensus was that she did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If that has changed since the page was deleted in December then you can recreate it, as long as you provide evidence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources (see WP:Bio). Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

RE: Welcome

Hi Sarah! Thanks for your message. Regarding the anonymous user who created the William Roache draft, he is an IP sockpuppet of Callumpaul40, a notorious vandal. Just letting you know. :) -- EpicPrime (leave a message) 17:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I have blocked User talk: 90.204.28.110 for 2 weeks. If you notice them making similar edits with a new IP address or username then you could open a new sockpuppet investigation, or leave me a message and I'll handle it. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10