Matthew Whitaker

edit

Hi, I'm writing you because you weighed in on this subject in a prior discussion. Are you aware that there's a pending RfC at Talk:Matthew Whitaker (attorney)#RfC: Jim Comey's comments about Matthew Whitaker? In fact, you're the only person who weighed in on that prior discussion and who hasn't voted in the RfC. Your participation would be welcomed. R2 (bleep) 21:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Werner Heisenberg

edit

I approved your edit at Werner Heisenberg, even though there's a slight problem. Your edit includes citations to reliable sources, and that's very good, as far as it goes, but verifiability suffers when you omit page numbers, as it makes it nearly impossible for someone to verify the new content. Can you please go back to your sources, find the page that supports the new material in section Interpretation of Quantum Theory, and add them to the citations using the |page= param? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply