Sarr X

April 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

{{Unblock on hold | 1=HJ Mitchell | 2=Yeah... hello again Wikipedia... As a result of my going on a vandalism spree for kicks about half a year ago, I earned this indefinite block I am currently appealing. A number of times during this time, I have seen something on a Wikipedia article that I thought didn't look quite right, was phrased wrong, etc. Seeing these, I wanted to fix them, but being indefinitely blocked, any sort of edit is a no go. So basically I admit that I was being a total ass, and that it's not acceptable to screw up Wikipedia articles for a few cheap laughs. I hope my block can be lifted, and I can go do something constructive once again. Sarr X (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | 3 = The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)}}

You're lucky I'm soft. I'll give you another chance. Just ... don't make me regret it. Happy editing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

https

Please check the links before you add https protocol. Sometimes it redirects back to http, and sometimes the link doesn't work at all -- e.g. see https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.72/Bug_Fixes#Blender_2.72a:_Bug_Fixes vs. http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.72/Bug_Fixes#Blender_2.72a:_Bug_Fixes. ... discospinster _talk 20:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Reported

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Wikieditoroftoday (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarr X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

agh! I was right in the middle of doing stuff with my user page! now I can't edit it! I knew switching those articles as a joke was a stupid idea....>_(\ *facepalm* stupid stupid stupid....

...can i edit my user page?

Decline reason:

No. PhilKnight (talk) 02:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.