User talk:Sarujo/Archive 9
BTTF and EVH
editJust wanted to let you know that I answered a question you asked a few years back. Happy New Year!
Talk:Back_to_the_Future:_Music_from_the_Motion_Picture_Soundtrack#Van_Halen_Song
Please come some agreement
editI wish to ask you to stop reverting the edits of From Hare to Eternity. You don't seriously think that those chunky large tabbed spaces are doing the article some good, do you? Further more the less bytes used on the page, the faster it loads. Think about it. Deltasim (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Image abundance
editHi, I noticed the revert and would like to discuss this with you. Articles about other NES games like Duck Hunt or Super Mario Bros. show 2 images of gameplay. Could you explain what is gross about Demon Sword having them? They appear to depict ground battle and air battle, much like the Mario article depicts above-ground and underground/castle combat. The third is simply the title screen, displaying the title screen is hardly something that would offend Namco, it's alongside showing the cartridge in presenting the surface while not revealing gameplay contents.
I am hoping to resolve the image discussion independently from the trivia section. I do ask though that if we are removing sections from the article that they be moved to the talk page so that other editors can review the ascertained triviality of facts. Y12J (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Okay first off, other stuff exists is not a valid argument. So let's leave off bringing up other articles.
- With that out of the way, the article is a stub so there is only but so may images that can be used before you get into copyright territory, especially if they are merely to garnish an article. Plus, only one image is need here to illustrate basic gameplay, and not one after another just show other quirks such as, he can attack while jumping. The title screen is redundant as it just shows the name Demon Sword and merely garnishes the article. There's nothing significant about it that would warren it's inclusion.
- As for that section, singling region differences is too trivial. Stuff like that is only good for a quick blurb in a development section. Plus there's the matter of that stuff being unsourced. Sarujo (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why should stub-status limit the depictions of gameplay to less than those of other games? Demon Sword is at least as large and complex a game as Super Mario Bros, even if we may currently lack as extensive an amount of information about it. The aerial + ranged aspects of Demon Sword is more of a critical feature to the game as opposed to a quirk, so depicting them isn't merely garnish. It's constantly a factor in the gameplay. As opposed to say, the Fire Flower in Super Mario, which is more of a temporary quirk. Right now the title screen has copyright information, so linking to it as a reference (just at a very low resolution) helps source the article, which I agree we could use more of. Describing areas of games appears to be common practice, though perhaps doing so in a more condensed version than a bullet list would be good I guess. Is it possible to shrink it to a blurb without actually erasing any of the information included on the list? Including detailed information about the game is how we grow it from a stub right? Y12J (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- It may be helpful to review the WP:VG guideline on Screenshot usage and ask yourself -- is the gameplay (ground/aerial or whatnot) impossible to describe in prose, and wouldn't the article be more fleshed out by a description of the gameplay? Salvidrim! 18:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why should stub-status limit the depictions of gameplay to less than those of other games? Demon Sword is at least as large and complex a game as Super Mario Bros, even if we may currently lack as extensive an amount of information about it. The aerial + ranged aspects of Demon Sword is more of a critical feature to the game as opposed to a quirk, so depicting them isn't merely garnish. It's constantly a factor in the gameplay. As opposed to say, the Fire Flower in Super Mario, which is more of a temporary quirk. Right now the title screen has copyright information, so linking to it as a reference (just at a very low resolution) helps source the article, which I agree we could use more of. Describing areas of games appears to be common practice, though perhaps doing so in a more condensed version than a bullet list would be good I guess. Is it possible to shrink it to a blurb without actually erasing any of the information included on the list? Including detailed information about the game is how we grow it from a stub right? Y12J (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Incredible Shrinking Woman
editI have a copy of that movie. The scientists concluded that it was a combination of the perfume, the glue, a variety of chemicals, ambient pollution, and her anemia that caused her to shrink. Thoughts? Czolgolz (talk) 03:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Mistakes
editHey, you have to correct your mistakes in your talk page replies before saving them. You made some here. I thought you didn't mind if I corrected them. Superghost987 (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Mad
editSure -- I'll add them to my watchlist. Trivialist (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Re:Jak and Daxter
editNext time I will, but I wasn't the one who started the edit war it was this user who acted like he had complete control over the page. ---StevenBjerke 16:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Join the peace side in the Wikipedia Revolution
editPlease join the peace side in my revolution against MikeWazowski. I am also sorry about the unnecessary edits on the Mad article. I listed you as an enemy, but if you join my side, I'll stop with the edits and list you as a friend. Thanks. The Web of TV3. (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
DB: Final Bout soundtrack
editHi there, I noticed that you created a lot of stuff for the Dragon Ball GT: Final Bout article some time ago, including the Music section. You noted that "Hikari no Will Power" is included as a bonus track, but it isn't on my CD or any other tracklisting I found online. There could be multiple pressings, of course--do you have a source for the track's appearance on the soundtrack CD? --ThunderPX (talk) 22:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Pink
editSo why did you revert the edit I made on the Pink article why you obviously had no source. Pink was published in Fresh Jump, V Jump was created in 1993, there is no way a 1982 manga could have been published in V Jump. Jeangabin (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: TMNT 2012
editI have been providing you sources DOWN TO THE TIMESTAMP. This is straight from Baxter and the Kraang's respective VA's mouths, affirmed by fellow (confirmed) cast member Rob Paulsen. How is this unreliable? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 12:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cardinal Direction (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Son Goku naming
editHi! In light of the naming dispute involving Goku, I did some searches for English RSes that mention the full name Son Goku. I found quite a few: Talk:Goku#Reliable_sources_in_English_using_.22Son_Goku.22 WhisperToMe (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Dragon Ball#RfC: Is it relevant to demerge Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z as separate articles?
editYou are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Dragon Ball#RfC: Is it relevant to demerge Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z as separate articles?. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014 film)
editPlease do not remove the cast list from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014 film), as it is NOT redundant and conforms to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, specifically WP:FILMCAST:
The structure of the article may also influence form. A basic cast list in a "Cast" section is appropriate for the majority of Stub-class articles. When the article is in an advanced stage of development, information about the cast can be presented in other ways. A "Cast" section may be maintained but with more detailed bulleted entries, or a table or infobox grouping actors and their roles may be placed in the plot summary or in the "Casting" subsection of a "Production" section. Use tables with care due to their complexity; they are most appropriate for developed, stable articles. (Tables are also recommended to display different casts, such as a Japanese-language voice cast and a English-language voice cast in a Japanese animated film.)
Virtually every film article in Wikipedia has such a cast list, so please do not remove it.Richiekim (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2013 (UTC)