Sasuke9031
SUP
editAdded shikai and bankai descriptions in the userpage where you requested it. Tell me if ya need anythin' else done to it. Suigetsu 20:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
- So a section briefly describing the users? I'll get on that in a bit. Suigetsu 23:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: Why?
editAlthough I am not a fan of Bleach and Shonen in general, those characters (Byakuya Kuchiki • Tōshirō Hitsugaya • Kenpachi Zaraki • Mayuri Kurotsuchi • Gin Ichimaru • Kaname Tōsen) are obviously not main characters and do not even have enough screen time. While they may look like gods in Bleach fans' eyes, I don't see why they need stand-alone articles. Ichigo Kurosaki is one of the most generic anime character I've seen but he is the main character in his own rights, so he has his page. Shrine Maiden (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Lisa
editFine, keep her. I like Alita better anyway! (I wasn't that IP, by the way, just thought it was a funny edit summary.) --erachima talk 06:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
List of Bleach chapters is having a peer review. Feel free to participate. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
List of bleach characters Discussion
editCan you return to the bleach discussion? i feel you might have information on the spiritually aware section. i never saw the fight between the two and keigo watching. though sometimes it may appear that he's looking at them fight but in reality he could just be freaking out that there bodies are lying on the ground not realizing that there spirits are fighting.
Anyways, like i said in the discussion, if keigo really did see them fight, then that would mean he was some-what spiritually aware, though the discussion is also about mizouru. How is mizouru spiritually aware?Haseo445 (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
DBZ character talk page
editHey mate. I'm asking if you'd be interested to check out the section I opened on the DBZ character talk page in regards to merging. It deals with moving many of the characters listed in the secondary section to the other (tertiary) section, as many more influential and important characters have now been merged or deleted. It would only be proper to sustain and maintain the same consensus on the entire page; I haven't made any changes as of yet as it may not be considered constructive to move characters without a proper debate. Those that are debatable, I've listed them in the same format and hope to get your vote for keeps and merges into the other section. I've only listed the ones I've found to be primarily lesser appearing characters and who are limited to one or two sagas at the most in their appearance, or remain background characters for the most part. As many of the characters who are listed in the secondary section are actually much lesser than those in the other, I was hoping to hear from you and get your votes on the matter. - Zarbon (talk) 23:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Sasuke9031. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Sasuke9031. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sasuke Uchiha project
editCurrently, there has been going on a project to make Sasuke Uchiha become a Featured Article, the highest ranking an article can take. It took a lot of effort to make other FAs Naruto Uzumaki and Allen Walker reached this state (just check the reviews). Editors tend to request for good grammar and important real world information while the prose has to be as neutral as possible. If you are interested in working you are welcome. Hope you enjoy editing the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Sasuke9031. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)