Sathe.steel

JW GB

Your edits at Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses have been reverted. If you believe there are neutrality issues, please start a section at the Talk page to raise your specific concerns. Adding a template to the article without any specific indication of what needs to be improved is not likely to result in any improvement to the article. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your edits have been reverted again, because you have again failed to indicate what you are disputing. You need to start a section at the article's Talk page and be specific about what you believe to be problems with the article.--Jeffro77 (talk) 07:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

And yet again. Please discuss why the article needs these tags.--Auric talk 13:38, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

I became aware of your reverts because this article is on my watchlist. This block might be lifted if you will agree to follow Wikipedia policy in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Block extended to one week for evasion. EdJohnston (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sathe.steel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

some information is inaccurate, which led to me to a failed essay and research at school. I will post accurate findings once I can catch up on extra credit

Decline reason:

That doesn't justify edit warring or creating a block evading sock puppet. PhilKnight (talk) 04:35, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.