Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Satvinder Juss! Thank you for your contributions. I am Flat Out and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Flat Out let's discuss it 13:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Satvinder S. Juss, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. TL22 (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Satvinder Juss. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Satvinder S. Juss, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Satvinder S. Juss

edit

I have reverted the edits you made at this article for a few reasons. 1. You removed the template at the top, the sourced content in the article, and the {{reflist}} template from the bottom of the article. 2. You have a conflict of interest and need to read WP:COI, and 3. Wikipedia articles are summaries of what reliable sources say about a subject- not just people writing about themselves. If there are problems with the article, please go to the article's talk page and leave a message for other editors that explains the problems. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Satvinder Juss. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TL22 (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

April 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Satvinder S. Juss. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TL22 (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply