Sch-u740

Re: State of Fear

Ok I will place the biased template on the page but first need more spesific examples. It will lead to more action to be taken place to resolve the neutrality of the article. Hda3ku (talk) 15:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I put my reply on your talk page. Also: someone may want to consider yelling at the people arguing in the articles discussion. THey were taking things waaaay too seriously and being very opinionated. Sch-u740 (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

That seems a good enough reason to place the biased template on the page I might need you to comment on the article talk page regarding the bias. Hda3ku (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I considered that, but theres been so much frivolous debating on that point in the talk page that I'm not sure a meaningful concern would be noticed. Maybe the talk page should be wiped of all old conversations?

Dont wipe the talk page, a bot will archive them eventually blanking or unessary removal of content is consided vandalism. Some things take time. A talk page is not a fourm or a almost every thing is noticed and this will be noticed. By placing the bias template on the page it placed the page into a catogory just wait a bit. Also, could you please reply on my talk page to keep this dissucion threaded on one page. Hda3ku (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)