Schalice

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Schalice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Bell's palsy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 04:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Talkback (Ks0stm)

Hello, Schalice. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 18:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Idea

Hi Schalice, i replied to you at WikiProject Wikipedia Awards and noticed your Idea. I have created an {{idea}} template based from it, although it has been previously deleted. Please feel free to check it out and update it as fits. (Also note i used your name in the example… if you disapprove please just remove it)

Thank you, and happy editing! benzband (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, I'm Delicious carbuncle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Might and Magic III: Isles of Terra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I believe that working on the product and having the credits in the form of the game's source code in front of me makes me a reliable source. Cheers! SChalice 05:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about what Wikipedia considers to be a reliable source. Please read WP:VERIFY. I'm not suggesting that you are making anything up, but Wikipedia simply has no mechanism for incorporating personal recollections. Sorry. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

You directly discourage building Wikipedia. Why did you revert my edit after I gave you the reliable source that you asked for? You lost the guy that originally started all those articles as pointed out in his profile along with many others that contributed to those articles. You specifically have lost me as a faithful and diligently accurate editor. Cheers! SChalice 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scalable Link Interface, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SLI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Acroterion (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Personal information

Don't post phone numbers and addresses of anyone on Wikipedia for any reason. If you do that again you will be blocked. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for conspiracy enthusiasts or a means for harassing people at work. Acroterion (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

RS, and what they are not

RS are not (and never can be) what I say I have personally found out.

To illustrate.

Yesterday I spoke personally to Mr Trump who assured my he was a small pink elephant in a toutou who dance the fandango on Saturday nights, and just dresses up as a man for a laugh.

Do you believe this, and if not why not, I spoke to him. Should this be included in out biography of Donny (after all I claim it is real, and no one can prove it wrong)?

This is why providing the phone numbers of a police department and getting us to investigate cannot be used as RS, what would you say if I told you I did speak to them, and they said they had investigated the claims of a basement (and there was not one). In addition they said that on at least one of the occasions Podesta was supposed to be using the (non existent, the police looked) sex dungeon he was not even in the country.

Do you accept this as fact?Slatersteven (talk) 21:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)