User talk:SchfiftyThree/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Signatures

1. Sorry to hear that you're too busy to go on at the same pace :/ You've been a great contributer and I'll still be happy if you can help out with anything at all. Best wishes, ~ Troy (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Agree with the above post: I've found my interactions with you to be very positive, and I am sorry to see you semi-retire. As always you will be welcome to return at any time. Best wishes. Acalamari 23:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Good luck, SF

It's a real bummer that you're to busy to edit here anymore. I hope you reconsider if you do have the time, but the choice is yours. Good luck! ~ Troy (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah, yes that page. It's actually quite a mess, because it exceeds the template namespace, so I can't add to it, really. I haven't looked at the linked recent changes for a few days now, but I can so for sure that (in retrospect) it has been working like a charm. Of course, thanks to the newly installed abuse filter, everything is much easier to work out now anyway :) ~ Troy (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Good luck to you, too. Acalamari 01:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

• Ditto. Húsönd 18:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry to see you too. Good luck to your real-life endeavors. bibliomaniac15 20:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

A greeting

SchfiftyThree emailed me the other day to say hello, that he misses the people he worked with and respected here, but that he is still busy with real-life events and is still retired here. However, he is doing fine in real-life. He wanted me to mention this on his talk page, and that he conveys he best wishes to everyone. Thanks. Acalamari 01:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

You can log out, but you can never leave

Welcome back. :) bibliomaniac15 02:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Hopefully, I should be gaining more activity if I keep visiting! Schfifty3 02:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back SchfiftyThree! It's good to have you here again, though I hope the break was beneficial. Best. Acalamari 15:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem. It may not be long before I start taking another break, however... :-O But, what the heck. editing wikis is what I'm devoted to! Schfifty3 03:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back, good to see you again. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 17:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:You just got a letter (e-mail)

And I just fired off another one to you. Cheers. Btw, nice sig. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 21:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, and the new signature was supposed to be new as part of my "returning state". Schfifty3 21:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Smosh

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Yes, I deem that edit vandalism because the user, who I already knew contested the CSD of his page, replaced your statement with something else. That, in my opinion, defines vandalism. As to my quickness with Huggle; I've had about 8-10 months worth of practice :). Cheers, Razorflame 21:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page

NellieBly (talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks! :-) Schfifty3 01:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the user page revert while I was busy blocking that account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem, any time. :-) Schfifty3 23:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SchfiftyThree. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback.
Message added 15:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The thing that should not be 15:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

misclick

sorry for the bogus warning. A8UDI 02:56, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

That's okay. Schfifty3 02:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

For helping out here. I guess it's not really a challenge when the user states they're vandalizing in the edit summary  :) Keep up the good work Tiderolls 01:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Moveprotects

Some pages are moveprotected because Jarlaxle/Grawp or a wannabe tried to move them, but were stopped by the edit filter. The attempted move still shows up in the EF logs, and because of these vandals' mulish persistence, I moveprotect the intended targets. If you have specific pages in mind that you can't see a reason for moveprotection, email me and I'll either explain or unprotect. And for heaven's sake, don't leave the project -- that is exactly what this vandal wants (in an incredibly gross overreaction to not being allowed to post a bunch of Dungeons & Dragons pages five years ago). NawlinWiki (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

• • It's not a "hobby", and I don't do moveprotects "because I like to." For example, Amleang was created by banned User:JarlaxleArtemis, and he kept vandalizing the page (through both moves and edit summary vandalism) after his contributions were deleted. (The subsequent "contributions" have also been deleted.) If you really think it should be unprotected, I will do so, but in my opinion it's just asking for trouble. Again, please let me know about any other pages that you think should be unprotected. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SchfiftyThree. You have new messages at La Pianista's talk page.
Message added 06:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 06:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

“ And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God. ” — (Alma 7:10)

The Thing _{Merry Christmas} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The Thing _{Merry Christmas} 00:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Your note

I've sent you an E-mail. Happy New Year to you too! Acalamari 17:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, SchfiftyThree. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Jody Lapidus

Its somewhat cruel you know, tagging the page as "gibberish, with no meaningful content". Haha.-Regancy42 (talk) 04:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I Don't Speak the Language/Bouncin' off the Walls

Hmm. I would say boldly split them into articles on the individual albums -- albums by notable artists are usually good enough for their own articles -- then prod the I Don't Speak the Language/Bouncin' off the Walls article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review: done

I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/SchfiftyThree (2). Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc). The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated! If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on. I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Happy You-Know-What!

Thanks a lot mate! :D  GARDEN  13:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

WTF

That comment wasn't directed at you, it was directed at the IP flood. Sorry for the confusion. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem, and I responded on the noticeboard. Schfifty3 21:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, SchfiftyThree. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

German names

Re[1]. Sorry I have no idea how non-admins are supposed to find out that globally locked accounts are in fact blocked, but admins can see it. You should probably trust them. You can see the hidden block entry in my block log. Most of these German names are globally blocked very quickly. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter

The January 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Email

And one has been slung towards you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 04:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Ping

You have mail. Tiderolls 01:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter

The February 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Hello, SchfiftyThree. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've replied further. Tiderolls 05:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter

The March 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Marking edits as vandalism

Hey, I noticed this revert was marked as undoing vandalism. You need to assume good faith on stuff like that. It could've been the guy's first edit, or possibly a test, or an edit by someone who doesn't know how wikis work. You do good work, but you just need to remember that not every incident like that is vandalism outright, kay? Other than this, keep up the good work! =DNeo^(T) 22:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and I will definitely work on that. :-) Schfifty3 22:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm not an administrator :P I can't remove anything. Besides, it wasn't like something horribly wrong. You should still have the ability to use Friendly and Twinkle. I don't see how those can be removed O_oNeo^(T) 23:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, and it turns out that it was another user's fault, so now I'm using it again. It's like I was almost having a heart attack. :-D Schfifty3 00:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space

Hey there SchfiftyThree, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:SchfiftyThree/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

As requested, I've added rollback to your account again - as we discussed at the original rollback request, I'm confident you know what you're doing with it and just wanted to see a slightly longer period of non-controversial editing. Best of luck with Huggle, etc - as always, just be sure to only use rollback it against genuine vandalism. ~ mazca ^talk 09:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Will definitely do. I've missed it for quite a while and need to use it again. After all, vandalism fighting is what I'm known for! :-) Schfifty3 16:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS April Newsletter

The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi.

I thought I should let you know that I reverted your edit here, as I think since it's just your opinion, you should bring up a discussion about it instead of removing it. If you create a discussion, I will be more than happy to explain my reasons. =) - Donald Duck (talk) 02:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Re. Hey!

Hello SchfiftyThree. Yes, I still remember you. Thanks for the greetings. :-) Regards, Húsönd 13:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)