SchirmerPower

Please see User talk:SchirmerPower instead, to make sure I get your message. Thanks

Non-free use disputed for Image:Angels vampires II 280px.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Angels vampires II 280px.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Christopher Daniel Kerner

You added this to Nena:

The couple had three children together, the first one being Christopher Daniel, who was born disabled due to alleged medical mistakes made during the birth, which caused Nena to go into cardiac arrest.

I do not have Nena's book, Willst du mit mir gehn, in front of me. What I remember is that Nena came close to bleeding to death after the birth, and that when she regained consciousness, at first she could not move. I don't recall anything about medical errors or cardiac arrest. Can you say where you got that information? Michael Hardy (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for my late answer. I copied a big block of this article from an old version which was vandalised. So I did not proved the content. I'll check this information and give you an update. SchirmerPower (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to F.C. Internazionale Milano, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Template:uw-vandalism1 - igloo:vandalism1 MJ94 (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism? Did you proved, what you reverted? Do you know what you are doing? From section FC Internazionale Milano as a company on everything is double. You can see the error beneath the table of "Kit providers and sponsors". Gerald SchirmerPower (talk) 11:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Accidents happen, sorry. MJ94 (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, mistakes can happen, and that's ok. But now I have a "Level 1 warning re. vandalism" which is not justified. That's why I'm "not amused". So please remove the Level 1 warning from my page. Gerald SchirmerPower (talk) 12:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

• Explain, please, how this means reporting MJ94 to AIV makes sense. Ironholds (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Ironholds, 1. the report is removed, what makes sense to discuss this any longer? 2. I made a useful edit, you can check it here and can evaluate it if this was really a useful change. MJ94 reverted my changes. Now the table is incorrectly formatted, sections are double etc. (The error ist still in this article.) That is no reason for an AIV report. But additionally now I have a "Level 1 warning re. vandalism" on my page and that's really not ok. And noone removes this unjust entry at my page. Can you tell me the correct page where I can report that? Gerald SchirmerPower (talk) 12:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Erm, you don't have to. You've got a level 1 vandalism warning, followed by the user who posted it apologising and admitting he was wrong. Ironholds (talk) 12:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

This is true. Consider yourself warningless. MJ94 (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Are you sure? I think the next (possibly incorrect) vandalism warning by igloo for me is a level 2 warning. But now it's ok, I make not so many edits, that this case will be more unlikely. Gerald SchirmerPower (talk) 13:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you're being passive-aggressive or not. Assuming good faith, let me assure you that anyone silly enough to post a level 2 warning after the level 1 has been apologised for will receive a slap around the ear from me. Warnings do not stack - it isn't a "four strikes and you're out" system. They are normally forgotten over a period of time. Ironholds (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward Archbold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Archbold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Archbold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BusterD (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Archbold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SchirmerPower. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)