Schmitty120
Is intelligent design necessarily creationism?
editHi, it's myles325 again. We had some laffs over the supernatural entry. I tried to find stuff that you posted in Evolution (talk) but could not - too many archives. But I'm interested in where you might be heading in this debate. I myself just posted a couple of rather large posts to the talk page of Intelligent Design. Prob a bit naughty becoz they do tend to be arguments about intelligent design rather than just the mechanics of the article, but hell, I actually find the talk pages of these articles to be one of the most interesting and dynamic features of Wikipedia.
I'm wondering what you might think of them. Have a look at points 14 and 15 in the talk page here. [[1]]
I've also appended some thoughts to your question on whether the question of mutations being good or bad is subjective or not, in the Science Reference Desk. Myles325a 05:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Myles back here. Actually, those articles have been transferred to my talk page in WP, so you can read them there. And I haven't got around to making my post to your "good or bad mutations" post yet. But I will. Myles325a 06:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Myles. Um, hey, to be honest I don't really want to talk on WP about evolution now or in the near future. I've been under a lot of stress lately. I don't like the way my last interaction here involving evolution went. Don't take it personally. But thanks for the thought. Schmitty120 22:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)