Schmoul Aschkenazi
um, you're looking for anarchists? None here. Fuck off, you nutball. Schmoul Aschkenazi (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
stupid anarchist wanker. your idiots down at fight dem back are just dam right stupi.d anarchism can never happen. Marxism-Leninism is the only way the international proletariat can ever achieve power. stop trying to act like the stalinist league only consists of me. it has 8 members australia wide. --124.186.35.11 (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Watson, you can fuck off now. Schmoul Aschkenazi (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I will never fuck off from fighting you anti socialist anti proletarian scum. You anarchists, neo-nazis, revisionists, and trotskyists think that you can defeat the Marxist-Leninist movement in Australia. But you can't. Every time you attack the MLS movement we, the Marxist-Leninists, will strike back one thousand times more stronger then your attack. You hear me? FDB and anarchism will be destroyed for ever. Your movement is doomed to fail. Fight Dem back and Slackbastard are fronts for the Anarchist Front of Australia and also the front of the Anti Normal People's Alliance. Stop making out that you are only against racism for you anarchists are against the working class movement in general. Anarchist are the enemy of the human race not just the proletariat. Viva Stalin, Viva Lenin, Viva Marx, and Viva Mao Zeadong. Proletariat arise, for with out power you are nothing but bitches of the nerds. --121.222.160.107 (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, now look, im not trying to start any arguments or make any enemies. I haven't vandalised any articles, I am genuinely attempting to improve the quality of the FDB article. As it stands (as reverted by you) it is non-partisan. Judging by your user page, you have a vested interest. All I request is that you dont rely solely on the FDB website, and specifically use other REPUTABLE sources for more important information. Wikipedia policy justifies my obstinance. Ergo, I will continue to revert until you somehow contribute at least to the discourse on the subject, instead of reverting, with miniscule and provocative comments. Regards, Maximus Meridius 10:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Granted, deletion is quite aggresive, but judging by the content of the original article I feel it was more than necessary. Wikipedia IS NOT a vanity, it is not a medium for shameless political promotion, it is not a biography of insignificant individuals. How can you possibly justify the content of the original article. It was written in an un-professional manner, and would only diminish Wikipedia as a source of neutral, impartial and fair information. What justification is there for using information from the FDB website. If the website administrator publishes information proclaiming the "Maximus_meridius smells" would it be fair to publish this in Wikipedia? Though my logic might be juvenile, it is nonetheless correct. Perhaps we could rebuild the article. I am more than happy for this to occur, so long as it relies on valid, and reputable sources. Maximus Meridius 10:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
MM, don't run your personal agenda under the guise of compliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Your ruse was absolutely transparent. Revert warring and sockpuppeting will get you banned every time you try it. Hope you're enjoying your little [holiday].
The initial author of the FightDemBack article is not known to the core of the FDB activists, which includes myself. The entry was brought to our attention after the fact of its creation.
In terms of provenance of information about the FDB group, one could do no better than to obtain that information directly from one of them. FDB activists, now made aware of the existence of the FDB article on Wikipedia, are presently directly involved with assuring accuracy of the entry. Schmoul Aschkenazi 01:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Personal info
edit
A serious message - PLEASE READ Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user with the intent to annoy, threaten or harass, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Such posting can cause offense or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia.
If you do not ensure that personal information you posted is removed from this site you may be blocked from editing this site. REMEMBER: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you.
-Will Beback · † · 09:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm presuming you've had the same counseling session with Alex 'Delos' Fogerty, haven't you, Will?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fight_Dem_Back&diff=prev&oldid=96243274
Ban me if you like.
Escalation
editThanks for yur note. I'd seen the comment on the talk page. It's better with these cases to avoid reacting in a way that makes the conflict interesting. Aside from the actions and words necessary to deal with the disruotion, it's better to ignore problem users. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
--Advice well taken, will do.Schmoul Aschkenazi (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)