User:Kleinzach's Welcome

edit
Hello, Schuylkill52! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! ```Buster Seven Talk 11:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

On reporting the COI of Servetus article

edit

Hi, I did not report it because it is true the consensus of editors supported the changes in the biography sections. I started to see bad faith when he insisted on the works. A COI deserves sometime to show good faith. So I granted him some months. Then I saw how obsessed he is and how he just wants to destroy, anything related to that scholar, and with multiple lies. A member of a historical figure institution, trying to deny the works of the historical figure. It was strange from a start. There is a very simple explanation, no support granted to the works cause of the indirect support it would grant to the other contributions of that scholar, the true identity of Servetus, and with it, his birthplace , all that user cares about. The insititute is located in the previous birthplace so, you can see what goes on. They have some problems, gonzalez was respect and he did publish under the MSI a new work by Michael, now what? now they say it is not true? Pretty ridiculous, or better said, obnoxious. Ah, the great theatre of the world.. --Anatoly Ilych Belousov (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia policy on personal attacks

edit

  Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. WP:NPA --Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks do not help make a point; they only hurt the Wikipedia community and deter users from helping to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about other contributors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to blocks. --Jdemarcos (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Michael Servetus Archive

edit

I have removed your comment on this page as it was in a portion that violated policy, specifically including WP:NPA. Archiving a talk page (as I noted on the linked page) is standard practice. Personal attacks are never acceptable on Wikipedia. The issue went through COI/N and is resolved. Pushing it further may be construed as being disruptive or as a personal attack. Either can lead to you being blocked. --Nouniquenames (talk) 04:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply