Scobiedont

Speedy deletion of Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS

A tag has been placed on Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Waggers (talk) 14:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

re Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS

Thanks for your message. There was no assertion of notability in the article, and therefore I could not be sure that the subject meets our notability criteria. I tagged the article for deletion rather than deleting it straight away to provide time for a notability assertion to be forthcoming, and to ensure that a second opinion was obtained (that of the deleting administrator). If you believe the deletion was an error, you can request restoration of the article at WP:DRV. Hope this helps, Waggers (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

CPS Article

No problem. Writing articles from an objective point of view is actually very difficult, so don't feel offended if others make edits accusing you of such. However, I would make sure you check your facts before writing some new material. There were a few facts (mostly minor) that you wrote in that were actually incorrect. Mipchunk (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit summary usage

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--Sting Buzz Me... 23:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)